Author
Müstakimzade Süleyman Sa'deddin
Publication Date
30.09.2019
Publication Place
İstanbul -
Turkish Manuscripts Association Publications
Subject
Sufism - OttomanSemaMevleviism
Type
Book
Language
ota,tur
Digital
No
Manuscript
No
Physical Dimensions
283 s. ; 25 cm.
Library
Ataturk University
Library Asset ID
0219098
Record ID
962020
Library Location
CENTRAL LIBRARY | M. MUHTAR KARAHANOĞLU HALL
Date
2019
Notes
There is a bibliography and index
The legitimacy of the music, sema', devran and dance performed by Sufis since the early periods of Islam has been a controversial issue. Some scholars argued that these were permissible, and some did not like their execution. In fact, those who engage in music, sema' and devran have even been accused of takfir. The intellectual conflict that occurred especially with the Kadızâdeli movement, which emerged in Istanbul in the 17th century and claimed that it was their motto to eliminate the heresies and superstitions that were said to have entered the religion later, gave way to conflict. The Mevlevis, who followed in the footsteps of Hazrat Mevlana and adopted his understanding of Sufism as their guide, remained at the center of these discussions because they were interested in music and sema. During this period, many scholars wrote works to prove that music and sema were permissible and defended the Sufis. XVII. After the century, some works were written. One of them belongs to Abdülganî en-Nablusî (d. 1731), one of the great scholars and Sufis of his time. Nablusî wrote his work, which he named el-Ukûdü'l-Lü'lü'iyye fî Tarîki's-Sâdeti'l-Mevleviyye, to defend Sufis in particular Mevlevis and to prove that dhikr and rituals such as music, sema' and devrân are permissible. Likewise, Müstakîmzâde, one of the most prominent scholars of the 18th century, translated/commentated this work, defending the Mevlevis and revealing his attitude on this issue. In the study prepared by Manuscript Expert Ensar Karagöz, based on two copies in the Suleymaniye Library (Pertev Pasha 427, Lala İsmail 179), Müstakîmzâde's work on Nablusî's Arabic work called el-Ukûdü'l-Lü'lü'iyye fî Tarîki's-Sâdeti'l-Mevleviyye The critical text of the translation/commentary called Şerh-i İbârât has been presented for the benefit of the scientific world. Moreover, in the introduction of the work, the Kadızâdeli movement and the banning of music and sema were examined in general terms, and Nablusî and Müstakîmzâde's connections with Mevleviism were tried to be explained.
Sorumlular
Müstakimzade Süleyman Sa’deddin ; Hazırlayan Ensar Karagöz
Dizi Kaydı
Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı Yayınları ; 116. Edebiyat ve Sanat Serisi ; 27.
Öz/Özet/İçindekiler
İÇİNDEKİLER
TAKDİM 4
KISALTMALAR 9
ÖNSÖZ 11
GİRİŞ 15
17. Yüzyılın Molla Kasımları: Kadızâdeüler 17
Mehmed Vanî ve Semâ'ın Yasaklanması 22
Mevlevi Müdafii İki NakşI: Nablusî ve Müstakîmzâde 23
Nablusî ve Mevlevilik 30
Müstakîmzâde ve Mevlevilik 33
İNCELEME 43
el-Ukûdu’l-Lüdü4yye fi Tarlki’s-Sâdeti’l-Mevleviyye 43
Eser Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmalar 44
Neşir ve Tahkikler 44
Tercüme ve Şerhler 45
Şerh-i İbârât 47
Şerhin Nüshaları 54
Tahkikli Metni Oluşturan Nüshaların Seçimi 63
Metnin Oluşturulmasında Kullanılan Yöntem 64
TENKİTLİ METİN 65
İmâm Hanbel’in İstikrahına Sebeb 82
İmâm Şâfi‘^1 Tegannl-i Câriyesini İstima’ı ve Cevâbı 83
İmâm Mâlik’in Nağmeyi Ta'^llmi 84
İmâm-ı A'^zam Konşu Nağmesini İstimâ“ı 85
Fukahânın Murâdlan 87
Lu'^b İle Emr-i Şerifleri, Fark-ı Lehv ü Lu'b 88
el-Faslu 1-Ewel Cemâ'^atle Namâz 99
el-Faslu’s-Sânl [Kurbân ve Hadis Kırâ’eti] 129
el-Faslu s-Sâlis [Va'z ve Sohbet] 144
el-Faslu’r-Râbh [Mesnevi Kırâ’eti] 151
el-Faslu’l-Hâmis [Mûsikî ve Semâ’] 161
el-Faslu s-Sâdis [Tevâcüd ve Devrân] 182
el-Faslu s-SâbF [İnhina ve Selâm] 198
el-Faslu s-Sâmin [Du'â] 214
el-Faslu t-Tâsi*^ [Enbiyâ ve Evliyânın Anılması ile Medhi] 220
el-Faslu l-'^Âşir [Fiüsn-i Niyyet] 229
Hâtime-i Terceme 238
EKLER 249
KAYNAKÇA 257
DİZİN 273
ISBN
9789751741431
Şekil
Basılı
Ortam
Kağıt
Demirbaş
0219098
Durum
Rafta
Sınıflama yer bilgisi
BP 190.5/M783 2019 k.1
