Al-Fanari’s footnote to Al-Jurjani’s explanation of positions, along with other footnotes
(حاشية الفناري على شرح المواقف للجرجاني مع حواش أخرى)

Name: Al-Fanari’s footnote to Al-Jurjani’s explanation of positions, along with other footnotes
Author: Al-Fanari, Hassan bin Muhammad Shah bin Muhammad Shams al-Din bin Hamza, 886 AH/1481 AD.

Title	Al-Fanari’s footnote to Al-Jurjani’s explanation of positions, along with other footnotes
Title Original	حاشية الفناري على شرح المواقف للجرجاني مع حواش أخرى
Author	Al-Fanari, Hassan bin Muhammad Shah bin Muhammad Shams al-Din bin Hamza, 886 AH/1481 AD.
Author Original	الفناري، حسن بن محمد شاه بن محمد شمس الدين بن حمزة، هـم
Publication Date:	1128 AH / 1715 AD
Publication Place	Istanbul - Turkey - Ahmed bin Youssef bin Hussein bin Issa bin Yaqoub bin Mustafa Al-Hamidi
Subject	Theology, beliefs.
Type	kitap
Language	Arabic
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	Yes
Pages Count	360
Physical Dimensions	جلده سختيان عليه زخرفة عثمانية مضغوطة، وله لسان، وحالته جيدة.
Library:	Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation
Library Asset ID	2327
Record ID	CP 55715
Library Location	Türkiye (Istanbul) - Hagia Sophia Library - Hagia Sophia
Date	1128 AH / 1715 AD
Notes	It includes a group of footnotes, apparently, and not by Al-Fanari alone, but it begins with two other footnotes and then comes Al-Fanari’s footnote. Due to the difficulty of reading it, the copy of Hagia Sophia No. 2234 was used, which in terms of the handwriting of the copy is the same as the handwriting of the original letter, i.e. Sharh Al-Mawaqif by Al-Jurjani. The copyist of the footnotes is the copyist of the original message, and what is apparent from Al-Hard’s phrase is that the copyist studied it with others and wrote in the margins those footnotes and comments until he finished everything in the year 1128 AH. Behind the footnotes are comments in red and black outside the second frame of the page, and under the footnotes are the names of the sources. One of the old indexers or readers came and marked with an arrow with a pencil the beginning of the footnote and wrote its title above it, and the number of lines is speculative because it is different. Very much, and the ruler is also speculative due to its extreme variation.
Sample Text	So, the basmalah is first mentioned, and if you say: The basmalah has no entry in the reference mentioned, because the basmalah is among what is excluded at the beginning of... of every art, and it does not occur by referring to the following objectives, so there is no basis for fa’, then you say: By including in the sermon of his book a reference to the objectives of the science of theology, it is only desirable, taken into account, and considered superior to the beginning of the book.
Cilt	مجلد
CDc	14232
Yazı hakkında notlar	دقيق، صعب القراءة
Durum	الأوراق متأثرة بتأكسد الحبر، وقد خرمت الأرضة شيئا من أطرافها السّفلية، وتأثرت الكتابة لذلك.
Mürekkep rengi	أسود وأحمر
Satır sayısı	8
Sahiplik	رامي باشا زاده مصطفى بك.
Kaynakça	الأعلام، ج 2، ص 216؛ كشف الظنون، ج 2، ص 1893.
Yazı türü	Naskh

View in source Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation

Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation

Al-Fanari’s footnote to Al-Jurjani’s explanation of positions, along with other footnotes

(حاشية الفناري على شرح المواقف للجرجاني مع حواش أخرى)

Author Al-Fanari, Hassan bin Muhammad Shah bin Muhammad Shams al-Din bin Hamza, 886 AH/1481 AD.

Author Original الفناري، حسن بن محمد شاه بن محمد شمس الدين بن حمزة، هـم

Publication Date 1128 AH / 1715 AD

Publication Place Istanbul - Turkey - Ahmed bin Youssef bin Hussein bin Issa bin Yaqoub bin Mustafa Al-Hamidi

Subject Theology, beliefs.

Type kitap

Language Arabic

Digital Yes

Manuscript Yes

Pages Count 360

Physical Dimensions جلده سختيان عليه زخرفة عثمانية مضغوطة، وله لسان، وحالته جيدة.

Library Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation

Library Asset ID 2327

Record ID CP 55715

Library Location Türkiye (Istanbul) - Hagia Sophia Library - Hagia Sophia

Date 1128 AH / 1715 AD

Notes It includes a group of footnotes, apparently, and not by Al-Fanari alone, but it begins with two other footnotes and then comes Al-Fanari’s footnote. Due to the difficulty of reading it, the copy of Hagia Sophia No. 2234 was used, which in terms of the handwriting of the copy is the same as the handwriting of the original letter, i.e. Sharh Al-Mawaqif by Al-Jurjani. The copyist of the footnotes is the copyist of the original message, and what is apparent from Al-Hard’s phrase is that the copyist studied it with others and wrote in the margins those footnotes and comments until he finished everything in the year 1128 AH. Behind the footnotes are comments in red and black outside the second frame of the page, and under the footnotes are the names of the sources. One of the old indexers or readers came and marked with an arrow with a pencil the beginning of the footnote and wrote its title above it, and the number of lines is speculative because it is different. Very much, and the ruler is also speculative due to its extreme variation.

Sample Text So, the basmalah is first mentioned, and if you say: The basmalah has no entry in the reference mentioned, because the basmalah is among what is excluded at the beginning of... of every art, and it does not occur by referring to the following objectives, so there is no basis for fa’, then you say: By including in the sermon of his book a reference to the objectives of the science of theology, it is only desirable, taken into account, and considered superior to the beginning of the book.

Cilt مجلد

CDc 14232

Yazı hakkında notlar دقيق، صعب القراءة

Durum الأوراق متأثرة بتأكسد الحبر، وقد خرمت الأرضة شيئا من أطرافها السّفلية، وتأثرت الكتابة لذلك.

Mürekkep rengi أسود وأحمر

Satır sayısı 8

Sahiplik رامي باشا زاده مصطفى بك.

Kaynakça الأعلام، ج 2، ص 216؛ كشف الظنون، ج 2، ص 1893.

Yazı türü Naskh