Representing agents, patients, goals and instruments in causative events: A cross-linguistic investigation of early language and cognition

Title Representing agents, patients, goals and instruments in causative events: A cross-linguistic investigation of early language and cognition
Author Ünal, Ercenur, Richards, C., Trueswell, J. C., Papafragou, A.
Publication Date: 2021-11
Publication Place - Wiley
Subject Causative events, Change blindness, Cross-linguistic differences, Event cognition, Event perception, Thematic roles
Type Periodical
Language English
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library: Özyeğin University
Library Asset ID 1363-755X
Record ID ce774b3d-41f8-4d19-8fa9-3fdfa0a951a4
Library Location Psychology
Date 2021-11
Notes National Institute of Child Health and Human Development ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Sample Text Although it is widely assumed that the linguistic description of events is based on a structured representation of event components at the perceptual/conceptual level, little empirical work has tested this assumption directly. Here, we test the connection between language and perception/cognition cross-linguistically, focusing on the relative salience of causative event components in language and cognition. We draw on evidence from preschoolers speaking English or Turkish. In a picture description task, Turkish-speaking 3-5-year-olds mentioned Agents less than their English-speaking peers (Turkish allows subject drop); furthermore, both language groups mentioned Patients more frequently than Goals, and Instruments less frequently than either Patients or Goals. In a change blindness task, both language groups were equally accurate at detecting changes to Agents (despite surface differences in Agent mentions). The remaining components also behaved similarly: both language groups were less accurate in detecting changes to Instruments than either Patients or Goals (even though Turkish-speaking preschoolers were less accurate overall than their English-speaking peers). To our knowledge, this is the first study offering evidence for a strong—even though not strict—homology between linguistic and conceptual event roles in young learners cross-linguistically.
DOI 10.1111/desc.13116
Cilt 24
View in source Özyeğin University Özyeğin University - Historical works, archives, and periodicals search engine
Özyeğin University - Historical works, archives, and periodicals search engine Özyeğin University

Representing agents, patients, goals and instruments in causative events: A cross-linguistic investigation of early language and cognition

Author Ünal, Ercenur, Richards, C., Trueswell, J. C., Papafragou, A.
Publication Date 2021-11
Publication Place - Wiley
Subject Causative events, Change blindness, Cross-linguistic differences, Event cognition, Event perception, Thematic roles
Type Periodical
Language English
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library Özyeğin University
Library Asset ID 1363-755X
Record ID ce774b3d-41f8-4d19-8fa9-3fdfa0a951a4
Library Location Psychology
Date 2021-11
Notes National Institute of Child Health and Human Development ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Sample Text Although it is widely assumed that the linguistic description of events is based on a structured representation of event components at the perceptual/conceptual level, little empirical work has tested this assumption directly. Here, we test the connection between language and perception/cognition cross-linguistically, focusing on the relative salience of causative event components in language and cognition. We draw on evidence from preschoolers speaking English or Turkish. In a picture description task, Turkish-speaking 3-5-year-olds mentioned Agents less than their English-speaking peers (Turkish allows subject drop); furthermore, both language groups mentioned Patients more frequently than Goals, and Instruments less frequently than either Patients or Goals. In a change blindness task, both language groups were equally accurate at detecting changes to Agents (despite surface differences in Agent mentions). The remaining components also behaved similarly: both language groups were less accurate in detecting changes to Instruments than either Patients or Goals (even though Turkish-speaking preschoolers were less accurate overall than their English-speaking peers). To our knowledge, this is the first study offering evidence for a strong—even though not strict—homology between linguistic and conceptual event roles in young learners cross-linguistically.
DOI 10.1111/desc.13116
Cilt 24
Özyeğin University - Historical works, archives, and periodicals search engine
Özyeğin University You are being redirected...

Please wait