Author
Ugur Bekir Dilek
Publication Place
Presidency of Religious Affairs -
Presidency of Religious Affairs
Subject
Diyanet scientific journal, 2021-09, Vol.57 (3), p.889-916
Type
Book
Language
ara,tur
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 1300-8498, DOI: 10.61304/did.904879
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4740aa7756c04cd8b293768ae5406b87
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes
One of the debates about qiyas is the issue of whether it is permissible to accept a component whose ruling is established in comparison with the Quran, Sunnah or ijma as the basis in a new qiyas process and to make a ruling on a new component compared to it. If the cause between the principal, whose judgment is fixed by one of these sources, and the secondary, whose judgment is fixed in comparison with this no, is the same as the cause between this member and the other part, whose judgment is fixed in comparison with this part, according to the majority of the proceduralists, the second syllogism process is just an unnecessary prolongation. Because there is a unity of reason between them, it is possible to compare the new members with those whose direct ruling is confirmed by the nas or ijma. The main point of discussion in this regard is the derivation of a cause other than the cause with which the ruling of the member is established and the comparison of another member to it. The majority of the usulists did not see this as permissible, arguing that it is not permissible to explain a provision with two causes and that the new cause to be deduced from the secondary cause is not a valid cause. This article explains why this is not permissible.
Detaylı Başlık
HÜKMÜ KIYAS İLE SABİT OLAN FER’İN YENİ BİR KIYAS İŞLEMİNDE ASIL KABUL EDİLMESİ MESELESİ
