In Pursuit of Style in İşari Tafsir: Necmeddîn-i Dâye and Bahru'l-hakāik

Name: In Pursuit of Style in İşari Tafsir: Necmeddîn-i Dâye and Bahru'l-hakāik
Author: Akar, Ayşe Mine

Title	In Pursuit of Style in İşari Tafsir: Necmeddîn-i Dâye and Bahru'l-hakāik
Author	Akar, Ayşe Mine
Publication Place	Duzce University - Duzce University
Subject	Düzce Journal of Theology, 2025-06, Vol.9 (1), p.339-364
Type	Book
Language	ara,eng
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	No
Library:	Leitir Library
Library Asset ID	ISSN: 2980-2814, EISSN: 2980-2814, DOI: 10.61272/duid.1681908
Record ID	cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ef3973960b394b6cacf38e4706c2f747
Library Location	DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes	Necmeddîn-i Dâye's (d. 654/1256) ishari commentary named Bahru'l-hakāik ve'l-meânî was written in the thirteenth century and has distinct stylistic features. The author mentioned the fact that no commentary containing all the subtle meanings of the Quran had been written before him as a reason for copyright. While the work was written by Dâye up to the Surah An-Najm, the chapters after this Surah were interpreted by Alâüddevle-i Simnânî (d. 736/1336). In his work, Dâye grouped his interlocutors in various ways and adopted a style that appealed to these groups. In addition to the parts such as common people, havas and ehassü'l-havas, groups such as ulemâ-i billâh, sheikhs, ehl-i hirka, felasife, theologians are included in the work. While interpreting the verses, the author often pointed out their literal meanings and drew attention to the literal interpretations he made with various words. While he used expressions such as "vallahu a`lem" to express that he did not know and could not know the accuracy of his comments, he warned the reader with "Fefhem" and its derivatives to draw attention to important issues. It is possible to name the first type of usage as submission expressions, and the second type of usage as admonition expressions. The author generally scolded his interlocutor in a literary style on subjects that he thought the ordinary reader could not understand; It is possible to describe these statements as statements of disbelief. Our study focuses on these stylistic features in the work, as well as the general introduction of Bahru'l-hakāik.
Detaylı Başlık	İşârî Tefsirde Üslûbun İzinde: Necmeddîn-i Dâye ve Bahru’l-hakāik’ı

View in source Leitir Library Leitir Library - Ottoman library catalog search

Leitir Library

In Pursuit of Style in İşari Tafsir: Necmeddîn-i Dâye and Bahru'l-hakāik

Author Akar, Ayşe Mine

Publication Place Duzce University - Duzce University

Subject Düzce Journal of Theology, 2025-06, Vol.9 (1), p.339-364

Type Book

Language ara,eng

Digital Yes

Manuscript No

Library Leitir Library

Library Asset ID ISSN: 2980-2814, EISSN: 2980-2814, DOI: 10.61272/duid.1681908

Record ID cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ef3973960b394b6cacf38e4706c2f747

Library Location DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

Notes Necmeddîn-i Dâye's (d. 654/1256) ishari commentary named Bahru'l-hakāik ve'l-meânî was written in the thirteenth century and has distinct stylistic features. The author mentioned the fact that no commentary containing all the subtle meanings of the Quran had been written before him as a reason for copyright. While the work was written by Dâye up to the Surah An-Najm, the chapters after this Surah were interpreted by Alâüddevle-i Simnânî (d. 736/1336). In his work, Dâye grouped his interlocutors in various ways and adopted a style that appealed to these groups. In addition to the parts such as common people, havas and ehassü'l-havas, groups such as ulemâ-i billâh, sheikhs, ehl-i hirka, felasife, theologians are included in the work. While interpreting the verses, the author often pointed out their literal meanings and drew attention to the literal interpretations he made with various words. While he used expressions such as "vallahu a`lem" to express that he did not know and could not know the accuracy of his comments, he warned the reader with "Fefhem" and its derivatives to draw attention to important issues. It is possible to name the first type of usage as submission expressions, and the second type of usage as admonition expressions. The author generally scolded his interlocutor in a literary style on subjects that he thought the ordinary reader could not understand; It is possible to describe these statements as statements of disbelief. Our study focuses on these stylistic features in the work, as well as the general introduction of Bahru'l-hakāik.

Detaylı Başlık İşârî Tefsirde Üslûbun İzinde: Necmeddîn-i Dâye ve Bahru’l-hakāik’ı