IS IT BEING MU'TAZILI TO ANSWER THE ALLOCATION OF THE DISTRICT?

Name: IS IT BEING MU'TAZILI TO ANSWER THE ALLOCATION OF THE DISTRICT?
Author: Omer Yilmaz

Title	IS IT BEING MU'TAZILI TO ANSWER THE ALLOCATION OF THE DISTRICT?
Author	Omer Yilmaz
Publication Place	Presidency of Religious Affairs - Presidency of Religious Affairs
Subject	Diyanet scientific journal, 2017-10, Vol.53 (3), p.53-71
Type	Book
Language	ara,tur
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	No
Library:	Leitir Library
Library Asset ID	ISSN: 1300-8498, DOI: 10.61304/did.393614
Record ID	cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ec5aad8058cd466f875ad52c410b05dc
Library Location	DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes	In the Hanafi method, the debate on the allocation of the cause has gained a theological identity from time to time. Although Kerhî, Cessâs and Debûsî allowed the allocation of the disease, the approach that dominated the Hanafi method in the period starting with Serahsi was to reject the allocation of the disease. Sarakhsî, who was the pioneer of this approach, considered allowing the allocation of the cause as "disobedience to the Mu'tazila". According to him, those who allow the allocation of the cause must accept the basic teachings of Mu'tazila - especially his view on the issue of accuracy in ijtihad. Ebü'l-Usr Pezdevî, in the same period as Serahsî, and Ebü'l-Berekât Nesefî, who lived two centuries after these scholars, established a connection between the issue of accuracy in ijtihad and the allocation of the cause. Serahsî, Ebü'l-Usr Pezdevî and Ebü'l-Berekât, in the Hanafi method, addressed those who allow the allocation of the cause. This approach, which is limited to Nesafî, has found many followers in the modern period. Accordingly, the fact that Iraqi Hanafis such as Kerhî and Cessâs allowed the allocation of the cause has been evaluated as a result of their exposure to Mu'tazili influence. The focus of the research is to question this evaluation. The discussion of the allocation of malady in Hanafi usul works, its relationship with the issue of accuracy in ijtihad, and the historical background of the approach that considers allowing the allocation of malady as a "tendency towards Mu'tazila" were examined within the framework of the research.
Detaylı Başlık	İLLETİN TAHSİSİNE CEVAZ VERMEK MU’TEZİLÎ OLMAK MIDIR?

View in source Leitir Library Leitir Library - Ottoman library catalog search

Leitir Library

IS IT BEING MU'TAZILI TO ANSWER THE ALLOCATION OF THE DISTRICT?

Author Omer Yilmaz

Publication Place Presidency of Religious Affairs - Presidency of Religious Affairs

Subject Diyanet scientific journal, 2017-10, Vol.53 (3), p.53-71

Type Book

Language ara,tur

Digital Yes

Manuscript No

Library Leitir Library

Library Asset ID ISSN: 1300-8498, DOI: 10.61304/did.393614

Record ID cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ec5aad8058cd466f875ad52c410b05dc

Library Location DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

Notes In the Hanafi method, the debate on the allocation of the cause has gained a theological identity from time to time. Although Kerhî, Cessâs and Debûsî allowed the allocation of the disease, the approach that dominated the Hanafi method in the period starting with Serahsi was to reject the allocation of the disease. Sarakhsî, who was the pioneer of this approach, considered allowing the allocation of the cause as "disobedience to the Mu'tazila". According to him, those who allow the allocation of the cause must accept the basic teachings of Mu'tazila - especially his view on the issue of accuracy in ijtihad. Ebü'l-Usr Pezdevî, in the same period as Serahsî, and Ebü'l-Berekât Nesefî, who lived two centuries after these scholars, established a connection between the issue of accuracy in ijtihad and the allocation of the cause. Serahsî, Ebü'l-Usr Pezdevî and Ebü'l-Berekât, in the Hanafi method, addressed those who allow the allocation of the cause. This approach, which is limited to Nesafî, has found many followers in the modern period. Accordingly, the fact that Iraqi Hanafis such as Kerhî and Cessâs allowed the allocation of the cause has been evaluated as a result of their exposure to Mu'tazili influence. The focus of the research is to question this evaluation. The discussion of the allocation of malady in Hanafi usul works, its relationship with the issue of accuracy in ijtihad, and the historical background of the approach that considers allowing the allocation of malady as a "tendency towards Mu'tazila" were examined within the framework of the research.

Detaylı Başlık İLLETİN TAHSİSİNE CEVAZ VERMEK MU’TEZİLÎ OLMAK MIDIR?