Author
Shasha, Mehmet, Simsek, Ahmet
Publication Place
Mardin Artuklu University Publications -
Mardin Artuklu University Publications
Subject
Intellect, Theologians
Type
Book
Language
ara,tur
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 2148-3264, EISSN: 2148-3264, EISSN: 2687-427X
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2a890a584a7b474a983992a77f954881
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes
Theologians have agreed that knowing knowledge of Allah is necessary. However, they could not agree among themselves as to the source of this obligation. This debate has focused especially on whether those who have not received the divine call will be held responsible and what their situation will be in the afterlife. The majority of Maturidi theologians, Mu'tazila and many contemporary theologians accepted knowledge of Allah as a mental obligation and claimed that these people would be deserving of punishment in the afterlife. Ash'arites, Hasheviyya, some of the Shiites, some of the Kharijites and Dirar b. Some prominent theologians such as Amr considered knowledge of Allah as a religious responsibility. On the other hand, another issue on which the theologians agree is that evil eye is necessary regarding knowledge of Allah. In other words, all theologians have claimed that knowledge of Allah can be achieved through reason, and that reason is a tool for knowing Him. According to these different results, the answer to the question of what will be the situation in the afterlife of those who do not know God because no divine message has reached them has also varied. In this context, those who see knowledge of Allah as a mental responsibility say that this person deserves torment in the hereafter; Those who saw a religious obligation claimed that there would be no otherworldly torment.
Detaylı Başlık
Kelâm ekolleri bağlamında marifetullahın vücûbiyet kaynağı
