Author
ÖGE, Ali, ÜREN, Halil İbrahim
Publication Place
Hits University -
Hits University
Subject
Number
Type
Book
Language
ara,eng,tur
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 2757-6949, EISSN: 2757-6949, DOI: 10.14395/hid.939361
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2444611b254c496d84601be52f7dc5cc
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals (WRLC)
Notes
Different figures have been expressed regarding the number of verses, which are evidence of the miraculous and uniqueness of our great book, the Holy Quran, in the surah and in the entire Quran. This situation is within the subjects of Ulûmu'l-Qur'an, under the title of Âddü'l-Ây, which is a science whose rules and principles are determined in a way that does not allow distortions such as additions and omissions to the Holy Quran. The attribution to the Prophet and his companions has been handled with a solid knowledge. In this science, which examines the number of letters, words, verses and surahs of the Quran, Islamic scholars have discussed this issue in depth and expressed different opinions. Although the number 6666 stands out according to general acceptance, this is not an accurate number and the number of verses in the current mushaf is 6236. Companions, tabi'in and later scholars expressed different opinions regarding the number of verses. From the Companions, Hz. Ali (d. 40/661) (r.a.) 6236, Abdullah İbn Mes'ud (d. 32/652) 6218, Ubey b. Ka'b (d. 33/654) gave the numbers 6210 and Abdullah Ibn Abbas (d. 68/687) gave the numbers 6216. Hz. The number given by Ali (r.a.) is equal to the number in the mushaf we have. Sa'id b. from Tabiun. Cübeyr (d. 95/714) gave the numbers as 6216, Muhammed İbn Sîrîn (d. 110/729) as 6216, Ata İbn Abi Rebâh (d. 115/732) as 6177, Humeyd et-Tavîl (d. 142/759) as 6212. Among the recitation imams, the people of Medina expressed their different opinions by giving the numbers as 6217, the people of Mecca as 6219, the people of Basra as 6205, the people of Kufa as 6236, and the people of Damascus as 6220. There is no disagreement in all 114 surahs, but there is disagreement in only 75 surahs. However, there is no debate about the number of verses of some suras, they are the same as the existing mushaf, and there is only a debate about which verses are independent. There are some reasons for the formation of different opinions. Hz. The recitations made by the Prophet (pbuh) while teaching the Quran or explaining some events that occurred can be considered one of the main reasons for the disagreement in the number of verses. Because in all these, Hz. The Prophet also taught the places to be dedicated. Over time, Hz. The Prophet was reciting some verses in vain. The companions who witnessed this situation thought that this application, which was made by combining several verses, was a single verse. As a result, different figures were reported in the narrations of the companions. Whether or not the basmalahs and Hurûf-u Mukattaa at the beginning of the surahs are considered as independent verses has led to the emergence of different opinions regarding the number of verses. In addition to these reasons, some of the verses that are included as a single verse in the Mushafs we have are counted as more than one verse, or some verses that are included as a single verse are combined and counted as a single verse, which are among the reasons for the conflict regarding the number of verses. Since the recitation studies were concentrated in Mecca, Medina, Kufa, Basra and Damascus in the first centuries, some of the Qurras became famous in the towns where they were located and with the mention of these towns. they came to mind. When evaluating the number of verses, these cities were mentioned instead of the Quran. When Medina is mentioned, Medeniyyü'l-Evvel, Medeniyyü'l-Ahîr; When Hijaz is mentioned, Medina and Mecca; When Iraq is mentioned, Basra and Kufa; When Haremiyyi is mentioned, Medina and Mecca; When Damascus is mentioned, Damascus and Himsiyyi are understood. Ja'berî, on the other hand, accepted "Hımsıyyi" as a separate school. Our scholars have produced different works regarding the number of verses since the early periods. In addition, the works written by Abu Amr ed-Dânî and Burhaneddin el-Ja'berî on the subject have been accepted as the main source by our scholars, and the opinions of these scholars regarding the number of verses have always remained at the forefront. In this article, we will benefit from other works written on our subject, and we will evaluate the disagreements in the number of verses, surah by surah, by taking into consideration Dânî's "al-Beyân fî Âddi Âyi'l-Kur'ân" and Ja'berî's "Husnü'l-meded fî fenni'l-aded", which are prominent in this field, and We will mention the verses one by one. Different accounts have been said about the numbers of the verses, which are evidences for the miraculous and the uniqueness of our holy book, the Quran, within the surah and throughout the Qur'an. This situation has been handled with a science titled 'Add al-Āyy among the Qur'anic sciences, which is a science whose rules and principles are determined in a way that does not allow for distortions such as addition to or incompleteness for the Qur'an and this has been dealt with an uninterrupted chain to the Prophet and the companions. In this science, which examines the number of the letters, words, verses and surahs in the Qur'an, Islamic scholars have dealt with this issue in detail and put forward different opinions. Although the number 6666 stands out generally, this is not an accurate number and the exact number of verses in available Muṣḥaf is 6236.The Companions, the successors and later scholars have expressed different views. From the Companions, Ali (d. 40/661) gave the number 6236 as well as Abdullah Ibn al-Mes'ud (d. 32/652) 6218, Ubeyy b. Ka’b (d. 33/654) 6210 and Abdullah Ibn Abbas (d. 68/687) 6216. The number given by Ali is equal to the number for available Mushaf in our hands. From the successors, Sa'id b. Jubeyr (b. 95/714) gave the number 6216 as well as Muhammed İbn Sîrîn (d. 110/729) 6216, Atâ İbn Abû Rebâh (d. 115/732) 6177 and Humeyd al-Tavîl (d. 142/759) 6212. Among the imams of Qira'at, the Medinan with the number 6127, the Mekkan with 6219, the Basran with 6205, the Kufan with 6236, and Damascene with 6220 gave their different opinions. There are no disputes in all 114 surahs, but only in 75 ones. However, there is no discussion in the verse numbers of some surahs, only a discussion about which verses are detached within the same text. There are some reasons for the different opinions. Recitations made by the Prophet (pbuh) in the teaching of the Qur'an or in some events that occurred may be one of the main reasons for the dispute in the number of verses. Because, in all these, Prophet taught the places for waqf. Over time, The Prophet was reading some verses with wasl. The Companion, who witnessed this situation, believed that this reading, which was made by combining several verses, was only a single verse. As a result, different numbers were reported in the narrations of the Companions. Whether basmalahs and al-Hurûf al-Muqatta'a at the beginning of the suras were regarded as a separate verse also caused different views about the number of verses. In addition to these reasons, it was another reason for the dispute regarding the number of verses that some verses going as a single verse in Mushafs we have were counted as more than one verse or the fact that some verses in a single unit are combined and counted as one verse. Because Qiraat studies concentrated more in Mecca, Madinah, Kufa, Basra and Damascus in the first centuries, some of al-qurras became famous in the towns where they lived and came to mind with the names of these towns When evaluating data numbers, these cities were mentioned instead of these al-qurras. Madaniyy al-Awwal and Madaniyy al-Akhir came to mind with the word al-Madani as well as Madinah and Makkah with al-Hijaz; Basrah and Kufah with Iraq; Madinah and Makka with al-Haramiyy and also Damascus and al-Hımsiyy with al-Şham. al-Jaberi accepted “al-Himsiyy” as a separate school.Our scholars have written different works related to the number of verses since the early periods. However, the works written by Abu Amr al-Dânî and Burhân al-Din el-Jaberî about this subject have been accepted as the main source by our scholars and their views on the number of verses have always been in the foreground. In this article, we will take into account, by utilizing also other related works, the two prominent works in this field, al-Bayan fi ‘Add Ay al-Quran by al-Dani and Husn al-Madad fi Fenn al-‘Aded by al-Jaberi, and evaluate the disputes in the number of verses, and will state the verses in question one by one.
Detaylı Başlık
Âyet Sayılarındaki İhtilafların Sûrelere Göre Tespiti
