Relation Between History and Progress in Mirza Saleh's Itinerary: Rays of Comparative History in Qajar Era

Title Relation Between History and Progress in Mirza Saleh's Itinerary: Rays of Comparative History in Qajar Era
Author Abolfazl Delavari, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh Majedi
Subject Progress
Type Book
Language Persian
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library: Royal Danish Library
Library Asset ID ISSN: 2008-8841, EISSN: 2538-3507, DOI: 10.22051/hph.2020.27863.1387
Record ID cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d45b03df4914362bab0f2e660b63bb4
Library Location DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes Mirza Saleh's Itinerary includes a detailed narrative of Western history. In this article, we have discovered the historiographic content of this itinerary and answered this question: What are the motivation, method, and attitudes of Mirza Saleh's historiography. By Thematic analysis, we found out that the high volume of historiography in this itinerary represents history's importance, both as knowledge and attitude. By frequent and detailed references to the West's history, Mirza Saleh has tried to explain the progressive foundations of western societies. In the historical attitude of Mirza Saleh, the evolution of human societies is gradual and a product of the accumulation of their experiences in the particular output of the characteristics and actions of the ruling elite. Behind the historical issues of Mirza Saleh's itinerary lies historical-comparative sociology, which is based on the distinction between the three patterns of society: "civilized society," "savagery" (non-civilized society), and "civilizing society". Britain is a sample of the first pattern, while the Ottoman Empire shows the second pattern. Russia is an example of the third model. The difference in the patterns results from the opportunity and speed of societal progress in freedom, trade, and industry. On the other hand, it is related to the ruling elites' character and determination to advance reform on the path of progress. Iran is close to the Ottoman model, and there is no other way to save it than to choose the path of progress.
Görüntüle تاریخ نگری و تاریخ نگاری, 2019-12, Vol.29 (24), p.95-116
View in source Royal Danish Library Royal Danish Library - Ottoman library catalog search
Royal Danish Library - Ottoman library catalog search Royal Danish Library

Relation Between History and Progress in Mirza Saleh's Itinerary: Rays of Comparative History in Qajar Era

Author Abolfazl Delavari, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh Majedi
Subject Progress
Type Book
Language Persian
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library Royal Danish Library
Library Asset ID ISSN: 2008-8841, EISSN: 2538-3507, DOI: 10.22051/hph.2020.27863.1387
Record ID cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d45b03df4914362bab0f2e660b63bb4
Library Location DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes Mirza Saleh's Itinerary includes a detailed narrative of Western history. In this article, we have discovered the historiographic content of this itinerary and answered this question: What are the motivation, method, and attitudes of Mirza Saleh's historiography. By Thematic analysis, we found out that the high volume of historiography in this itinerary represents history's importance, both as knowledge and attitude. By frequent and detailed references to the West's history, Mirza Saleh has tried to explain the progressive foundations of western societies. In the historical attitude of Mirza Saleh, the evolution of human societies is gradual and a product of the accumulation of their experiences in the particular output of the characteristics and actions of the ruling elite. Behind the historical issues of Mirza Saleh's itinerary lies historical-comparative sociology, which is based on the distinction between the three patterns of society: "civilized society," "savagery" (non-civilized society), and "civilizing society". Britain is a sample of the first pattern, while the Ottoman Empire shows the second pattern. Russia is an example of the third model. The difference in the patterns results from the opportunity and speed of societal progress in freedom, trade, and industry. On the other hand, it is related to the ruling elites' character and determination to advance reform on the path of progress. Iran is close to the Ottoman model, and there is no other way to save it than to choose the path of progress.
Görüntüle تاریخ نگری و تاریخ نگاری, 2019-12, Vol.29 (24), p.95-116
Royal Danish Library - Ottoman library catalog search
Royal Danish Library You are being redirected...

Please wait