Author
Saying of Ahmad Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Khidr al-Samarqandi Abu al-Qasim ibn Abi Bakr al-Laythi al-Samarqandi Manla Khusraw al-Qazwini Jalal al-Din Muhammad al-Khatib al-Qazwini ibn al-Hajib, Jamal al-Din Abu Amr Uthman ibn Omar
Author Original
Kul Ahmed, Ahmed b. Muhammed b. Hıdır [d. 950/1543] /
قول أحمد, أحمد بن محمد بن خضر (MS 436);
es-Semerkandî, Ebu’l-Kâsım b. Ebu Bekr el-Leysî es-Semerkandî [d. 888/1483] /
السمرقندي, أبو القاسم بن أبي بكر الليثي السمرقندي (MS 437);
Molla Hüsrev [d. 885/1480] /
منلا خسرو (MS 438);
el-Kazvînî, Celâluddîn Muhammed el-Hatîb el-Kazvînî [d. 739/1338] /
القزويني, جلال الدين محمد الخطيب القزويني (MS 439);
İbnü’l-Hâcib, Cemâleddîn Ebû Amr Osmân b. Ömer [d. 646/1249] /
ابن الحاجب، جمال الدين أبو عمرو ع
Publication Date
1755; n.d.; 1761; n.d.; 1764
Subject
Manuscripts, ArabicArabic language--RhetoricMetaphorIslamic law--Interpretation and construction--Early works to 1800HanafitesIslamic lawMalikites--Early works to 1800Arabic language--Early works to 1800
Type
Book
Language
Undetermined
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
Yes
Pages Count
216
Physical Dimensions
5 manuscripts in 1 bound, (various lines) / 21x17 cm.
Library
Koç University Suna Kıraç Library
Record ID
164104
Library Location
Suna Kıraç Library, Special Collections and Archives / Suna Kıraç Library, Special Collections and Archives
Date
1755; n.d.; 1761; n.d.; 1764-1168; n.d.; 1175; n.d.; 1178
Notes
Five different manuscripts bound in one volume. Written as one column with various lines per page. Taʿlīq script in black ink with some words in red. The volume has paperback.
Sample Text
It is a work created and bound by bringing together 5 different manuscripts (Manuscript numbers: MS 436, MS 437, MS 438, MS 439, MS 440).
AD 436:
This work on the science of rhetoric is based on Ebü'l-Kâsım es-Samerkandî's work Ferâidü'l-Fevâid li-Tahkîki Me'âni'l-İsti'ârât, also known as el-Ferîde and er-Risâletü's-Semerkandiyye, by Ahmed b., known as Kul Ahmet. Muhammad b. It is Hıdır's commentary. The source text Ferâidü'l-Fevâid consists of fifteen parts called "feride" (single stone, diamond) in three parts called "ıkd" (necklace). The first part is devoted to the types of metaphors and similes, and the second part is devoted to the disputes regarding metaphors. The third part is about issues related to presumption and dissection in metaphor. Many commentaries and annotations were written on this text, and the work was also compiled into verse. The edition of the work was also critiqued (see bibliography).
It is the first work in a magazine with five works. His copyist was Süleyman b., known as Hocazâde. It is Mehmed. Its copying was completed in Konya in April-May 1755. There are occasional footnotes along the edges. The copy is rejected.
437 AD:
This work on the science of rhetoric can be found in el-Ferîde, er-Risâletü's-Semerkandiyye, etc. It is also referred to by names. Author Samarkandî states in the preface of the work that details about the definition, types and relevance of metaphor are included in the rhetoric books in a way that makes it difficult to understand, and therefore he presents the information on the subject in a concise manner. The treatise consists of fifteen parts called "feride" (single stone, diamond) within three parts called "ıkd" (necklace). The first part is devoted to metaphor and metaphor types, the second part is devoted to disputes regarding metaphors, and the third part is devoted to issues related to presumption and interpretation in metaphor. About thirty commentaries were made on the treatise.
It is the second work of the five-work magazine. In 37a there is an Arabic na't signed in the name of Selman. Then the edges are empty.
AD 438:
The work written by the famous Ottoman scholar Molla Hüsrev consists of an introduction and two parts. In the introduction, the method of fiqh and definitions of fiqh are given. The first part is divided into four parts: book, sunnah, ijma and qiyas. The second part is about the provisions. The author later wrote a commentary on this work called Mir'âtu'l-usûl. There are also annotations written on Mir'ât. Osman b. Mir'ât, which was translated into Ottoman Turkish by Mustafa el-Geliboli under the name Teshilü Mirkâti'l-vüsûl ila ilmi'l-usûl (Istanbul, 1288), was translated into Turkish by Haydar Sarıoğlu together with Mirkât. The work was also studied as a master's thesis by Seyit Badır (see References).
It is the third of the magazine with five works. There is no copying record. There is the name of the work in 39a. 55b is empty. There are very few fevâid on the edges. The copy is rejected.
AD 439:
It is the summary of the third chapter of Miftâhu'l-'Ulûm, one of the founding texts in the field of rhetoric written by Sekkâkî, prepared by Celâleddîn Muhammed el-Hatîb el-Kazvînî under the name Telhîsü'l-Miftâh. Many people, especially Teftâzânî, have studied Telhis, which was taught as a textbook in Ottoman madrasahs. The commentator states that he wrote this commentary in order to eliminate some literary flaws in Miftâhu'l-'Ulûm, which he presents as the most valuable work in terms of content and organization in the field of Rhetoric. He mentions these literary defects as hasviyyât (unnecessary words), tatvîlât (unnecessary extensions) and Ta'kîdât.
It is the fourth work of the magazine with five works. There are polite words in 56a. There are metaphorical leaves between 86a-89b. No separate receipt was kept for these leaves, which may belong to another work. 90a-b is empty. There are also comments written by more than one person in the margins. Some of these are very irregular; In fact, notes were made on some leaves, as if scribbling.
440 AD:
It is a compilation of İbnü'l-Hâcib's work titled Müntehe's-sûl ve'l-emel fî fî ilmeyi'l-usûli ve'l-cedel, which he had previously written. The work, which started to be taught as a textbook in madrasas during the author's lifetime, is also among the textbooks of Ottoman madrasahs. On the source work known by names such as Muhtasar, Muhtasaru'l-Müntehâ and Muhtasar-ı İbnü'l-Hâcib, Kutbuddin Şîrâzî (d. 710/1311), Adudiddin el-Îcî (d. 756/1355) and Seyyid Şerif Cürcânî (d. 816/1413). More than fifty commentaries were written by many scholars such as, and annotations were made on some of these commentaries. The most famous of these is Adududdin el-Îci's Şerhu Muhtasari'l-muntehâ.
It is the last of the magazine with five works. The copy we have of the work is incomplete. In this copy, there are fifteen pages from the beginning of the work: there is no introduction; directly to the text. Then the edges are empty. There is Turkish poetry on the front and back covers. The copy is rejected.
Bağışçı
Salim Erel
Ciltleme ve tezhip
Mukavva cilt.
MS 436, Tezhip özellikleri : Metin olan yerler kırmızı mürekkeple imlâ edilmiştir.
MS 437, Tezhip özellikleri : Önemli görülen bazı kelimelerin üst taraflarıve 39b’deki cetvel kırmızı mürekkeple imlâ edilmiştir.
MS 438, Tezhip özellikleri : Önemli görülen bazı kelimelerin üst tarafları kırmızı mürekkeple imlâ edilmiştir.
MS 439, Tezhip özellikleri : Önemli görülen bazı kelimeler kırmızı mürekkeple imlâ edilmiştir.
MS 440, Tezhip özellikleri : Önemli görülen bazı kelimeler kırmızı mürekkeple imlâ edilmiştir.
Dijital koleksiyon
Koç University Manuscripts Collection
Dijitalleştirme özellikleri
Original scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000C A2 scanner and saved as 300 dpi uncompressed tiffs. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as jpeg.
Format
jpeg
Kaligrafi stili
MS 436, MS 437, MS 438, MS 439, MS 440 : Talik / Taʿlīq script
Kaynakça ve diğer nüshalar
MS 436: TDVİA, C. 36, s. 473-74; Yanan, Emine Sena. (2004). Kul Ahmed’in Ebu’l-Kasım es-Semerkandî’nin “Ferâidü’l-Fevâid” adlı eserine yazdığı şerhin tahkikli neşri (edisyon kritiği) (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
MS 437: TDVİA, C. 36, s. 472-73. Diğer nüshalar: İstanbul, Kahire ve Cezayir’de birçok baskısı yapılan eserin Türkiye yazma eser kütüphanelerinde elli kadar nüshası gözükmektedir.
MS 438: TDVİA, C. 30, s. 148. Diğer nüshalar: Ondan fazla basılan eserin Türkiye yazma eser kütüphanelerinde elli kadar nüshası bulunmaktadır.
MS 439: TDVİA, C. 30, s. 20-21; Arslan, Hüseyin. (2019). Kadîm iki belâgat risalesinin mukayesesi: “Miftâhu’l-‘Ulûm” ve “Telhîsu’l-Miftâh.” Rumeli’de Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17, 597.
Mürekkep rengi
MS 436, MS 437, MS 438, MS 439, MS 440 : Siyah
Müstensih
Hocazâde Süleyman b. Mehmet (MS 436)
Telif hakkı ve kullanım
Bu websitesindeki tüm görüntü ve materyaller görüntüleme amaçlıdır bu nedenle kullanıcılar Koç Üniversitesi'nden yazılı izin alınmaksızın herhangi bir biçimde kopyalama, çoğaltma, herhangi bir biçimde dağıtım, değiştirme, uyarlama veya ekleme yapamazlar. İlgili kanuna istinaden izin verilen eğitim ve öğretim faaliyetleri kapsamında materyallerin kullanımına bağlı şartlar eser sahibi ve/veya Koç Üniversitesi'ne aittir. Daha fazla bilgi için: [email protected]. / All images and materials are for viewing purposes and users may not copy, reproduce, distribute in any form, perform, alter, adapt or add to materials in whatsoever form without express written consent of Koç University. Any educational and academic uses which are permitted under the compliance to the relevant laws must credit the Author and Koç University. For more information, contact us at: [email protected].
