Author
Hossam El-Din Hassan Al-Kati Hussam El-Din Hassan Al-Kati Tashakbarizadeh, Essam El-Din Abu Al-Khair Ahmed bin Mustafa bin Khalil
Author Original
حسام الدين حسن القاطي Hüsameddin Hasan Kâti, 1359 (MS 623); حسام الدين حسن القاطي Hüsameddin Hasan Kâti, 1359 (MS 624); Taşköprüzâde İsâmeddîn Ebü’l-Hayr Ahmed b. Mustafâ b. Halîl [d. 968 / 1569] / طاشكبري زاده، عصام الدين أبو الخير أحمد بن مصطفى بن خليل (MS 625)
Publication Date
n.d.; n.d.; n.d.
Subject
Manuscripts, ArabicLogic -- Early works to 1800Logic, MedievalDialectic -- Early works to 1800Debates and debating -- Early works to 1800Research -- Methodology -- Early works to 1800Arabic language -- Rhetoric -- Early works to 1800Logic -- Early works to 1800
Type
Book
Language
Undetermined
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
Yes
Pages Count
165
Physical Dimensions
3 manuscripts in 1 volume, (15, 17 and 21 lines)/ 60x14,5 cm.
Library
Koç University Suna Kıraç Library
Record ID
170231
Library Location
Suna Kıraç Library, Special Collections and Archives / Suna Kıraç Library, Special Collections and Archives
Date
n.d.; n.d.; n.d.-n.d.; n.d.; n.d.
Notes
Three different manuscripts bound in one volume. Taʿlīq and Naskh scripts are used in black ink with 15, 17, and 19 lines per page. It has a cartoon binding with a flap.
Sample Text
It is a work created and bound by bringing together three different manuscripts (Manuscript numbers: MS 623, MS 624, MS 625).
623 AD: Many works in the genre of Îsâgûcî were written, which are about genus, species, division, hasse and araz-ı 'am, known as kulliyat-ı hamse in the science of logic. Esîruddin el-Ebherî's work known as Îsâ gûcî fi'l-Mantık and Risaletu'l-Esîriyye fi'l-Mantık is the most famous work of Îsâgûcî literature. Commentaries, annotations and instructions were written on this text of Ebheri, which was taught as a textbook in Ottoman madrasahs. El-Fevâidu'l-Fenâriyye of Molla Fenârî, the first Ottoman Sheikh, and this commentary of Hüsâmeddin Hasan el-Kâtî that we have are the most important ones. On this comment, which is known as the first of Îsâgûcî's commentaries, there are also et-Tâlişî, el-Berda'î, Yahya b. Annotations were written by scholars such as Nasûh, Şirvânî and Karaca Ahmed. There are also various editions of the work, which was studied as a master's thesis. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: It is the first work of the three-work magazine. The copy of the work we have is missing at the end. Just below the copy record in 59a, Hafız Mehmet b. Ibrahim b. Yusuf b. Ibrahim b. There is an appropriation record written in red ink in the name of Yusuf, the appropriation form is "Dehale fi". In 59b there is information about the science of logic. There are correction records in the margins. The copy is rejected
624 AD: It is the commentary of Esîruddin el-Ebherî's famous text called Îsâgûcî fi'l-Mantık. On this comment, which is known as the first of Îsâgûcî's commentaries, others, including et-Tâlişî, el-Berda'î, Yahya b. Annotations were written by scholars such as Nasûh, Şirvânî and Karaca Ahmed. There are also various editions of the work, which was studied as a master's thesis. Additional information: It is the second work of the three-work magazine. There is no record of copying in the copy we have. In 59b there is information about the science of logic. In 78a, there are descriptions in Turkish about three things that must be known in any science to be researched. In 78b there are comments on logic, poetry and rhetoric. In the margins, there are correction records and quotes from authors/works such as Fenârî, Şems[siyye], Isâmuddîn, Muhyiddîn, Abdulkadîr, Burhan. The copy is rejected.
625 AD: The Arabic work belonging to Taşköprülüzâde, one of the famous Ottoman thinkers and scholars who lived in the 16th century, deals with the subject of debate, which is a subject of the science of logic. In the work, also known with names such as Risâle fî ilmi'l-âdâb, Risâletu'l-âdâb, the description of the debate, the duties of the parties in the debate and concepts such as men', nakz, sâil, mu'allil are discussed. This treatise, which is small in volume, is like a small dictionary of the science of debate. Taşköprülüzâde himself and İsmail Hakkı Bursevi wrote commentaries on the work. An investigative translation of the published work (Baghdad, 1955) was also prepared by Abdurrahim Güzel (see References). Additional information: It is the third work of the three-work magazine. There is no record of copying in the copy we have. In 79a, there is an Arabic favaid and a Turkish ode regarding the nahve. In 80b, there is a Turkish ode and Arabic commentary on logic and nahve. About the magazine: The magazine we have is a magazine without a date; There is no record of copying in any of the copies. The compiler of the magazine is unknown. In the first copy, Hafız Mehmet b. Ibrahim b. Yusuf b. Ibrahim b. There is one undated appropriation record in the name of Yusuf, but Hafız Mehmed must have owned only this first copy, not the entire magazine. As a matter of fact, the record of appropriation is not in the zahriye but in the leaf where the copying record is found (59a).
Bağışçı
Salim Erel
Ciltleme ve tezhip
Sırtı deri mukavva cilt. MS 623, Tezhip özellikleri : “Kâle-Ekûlu” kelimeleri kırmızı mürekkeple imlâ edilmiştir. MS 624, Tezhip özellikleri : “Kâle-Ekûlu” kelimeleri kırmızı mürekkeple imlâ edilmiştir.
Dijital koleksiyon
Koç University Manuscripts Collection
Dijitalleştirme özellikleri
Original scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000C A2 scanner and saved as 300 dpi uncompressed tiffs. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000
Format
jpeg
Kaligrafi stili
MS 623, MS 624 : Talik / Taʿlīq script. MS 625 : Nesih / Naskh script
Kaynakça ve diğer nüshalar
MS 623: Keşfü’z-zunûn, C. 1, s. 207; Kömürcü, Kamil. (2018). Mantık tarihinde İsagoci geleneği. Bilimname, 36(2), 45-62. Diğer nüshalar: Eserin Türkiye yazma eser kütüphanelerinde iki yüz kadar nüshası bulunmaktadır.
MS 624: Keşfü’z-zunûn, C. 1, s. 207; Kömürcü, Kamil. (2018). Mantık tarihinde İsagoci geleneği. Bilimname, 36(2), 45-62.Diğer nüshalar: Eserin Türkiye yazma eser kütüphanelerinde iki yüz kadar nüshası bulunmaktadır.
MS 625: TDVİA, C. 40, s. 151-52; Kepekçi, Berra. (2020). Taşköprülüzâde Ahmed Efendi’nin “Şerhu Âdâbi’l-Bahs ve’l-Münazara” eseri bağlamında münazara ilmi. İhsan Fazlıoğlu, İbrahim Halil Üçer (Yay. Haz.). Taşköprülüzâde’de bilgi, bilim ve varlık içinde (s. 131). İstanbul: İlem Yayınları; Güzel, Abdurrahim. (1990). İlk Heyet- i İlmiye çalışmaları, alınan kararlar ve dinî tedrisât. Erciyes Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 7, 203-214. Diğer nüshalar: Eserin Türkiye yazma eser kütüphanelerinde Taşköprülüzâde’nin şerhiyle birlikte dört yüz elli civarında nüshası gözükmektedir.
Mürekkep rengi
MS 623, MS 624, MS 625 : Siyah
Telif hakkı ve kullanım
Bu websitesindeki tüm görüntü ve materyaller görüntüleme amaçlıdır bu nedenle kullanıcılar Koç Üniversitesi'nden yazılı izin alınmaksızın herhangi bir biçimde kopyalama, çoğaltma, herhangi bir biçimde dağıtım, değiştirme, uyarlama veya ekleme yapamazlar. İlgili kanuna istinaden izin verilen eğitim ve öğretim faaliyetleri kapsamında materyallerin kullanımına bağlı şartlar eser sahibi ve/veya Koç Üniversitesi'ne aittir. Daha fazla bilgi için: [email protected]. / All images and materials are for viewing purposes and users may not copy, reproduce, distribute in any form, perform, alter, adapt or add to materials in whatsoever form without express written consent of Koç University. Any educational and academic uses which are permitted under the compliance to the relevant laws must credit the Author and Koç University. For more information, contact us at: [email protected].