Yazar
Başaran, Halil Rahman
Basım Tarihi
2011
Basım Yeri
-
Inderscience Publishers
Konu
Advisory opinions, Judicial propriety, Precedent, International court of justice, International public interest, Legal frameworks, Kosovo, Eastern Carelia, International relations, Palestine, International law
Tür
Süreli Yayın
Dil
İngilizce
Dijital
Evet
Yazma
Hayır
Kütüphane
Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası
2044-7671
Kayıt Numarası
8e36ee99-f965-47f5-9f53-614c9ccb62ff
Lokasyon
Law
Tarih
2011
Notlar
Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.
Örnek Metin
This paper's focus is on a certain aspect of the Advisory Opinion: The Consistency of the Court with Regard to Judicial Propriety. Apart from the Eastern Carelia and the Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict cases, the Court has always issued its opinion on request. The Court has, whatever the objections, opted for the issuance of opinions. It has consistently followed its own precedent of never finding an obstacle concerning judicial propriety. In that regard, some indications about the term judicial propriety have been given by some advisory opinions. Still, it is not exactly defined. In that connection, the paper engages in that definition and the argument is advanced that judicial propriety is a broad umbrella-concept.
DOI
10.1504/IJPLAP.2011.043855
Cilt
1
