نویسنده
Başaran, Halil Rahman
تاریخ انتشار
2011
محل انتشار
-
Inderscience Publishers
موضوع
Advisory opinions, Judicial propriety, Precedent, International court of justice, International public interest, Legal frameworks, Kosovo, Eastern Carelia, International relations, Palestine, International law
نوع
دوره ای
زبان
انگلیسی
دیجیتال
بله
نسخه خطی
خیر
کتابخانه
دانشگاه اوزیغین
شناسه دارایی کتابخانه
2044-7671
شماره ثبت
8e36ee99-f965-47f5-9f53-614c9ccb62ff
محل کتابخانه
Law
تاریخ
2011
یادداشتها
Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.
متن نمونه
This paper's focus is on a certain aspect of the Advisory Opinion: The Consistency of the Court with Regard to Judicial Propriety. Apart from the Eastern Carelia and the Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict cases, the Court has always issued its opinion on request. The Court has, whatever the objections, opted for the issuance of opinions. It has consistently followed its own precedent of never finding an obstacle concerning judicial propriety. In that regard, some indications about the term judicial propriety have been given by some advisory opinions. Still, it is not exactly defined. In that connection, the paper engages in that definition and the argument is advanced that judicial propriety is a broad umbrella-concept.
DOI
10.1504/IJPLAP.2011.043855
Cilt
1
