نویسنده
Acar, İbrahim Hakkı, Torquati, J. C., Raikes, H., Rudasill, K. M.
تاریخ انتشار
2020-11
محل انتشار
-
Taylor & Francis
نوع
دوره ای
زبان
انگلیسی
دیجیتال
بله
نسخه خطی
خیر
کتابخانه
دانشگاه اوزیغین
شناسه دارایی کتابخانه
1040-9289
شماره ثبت
05c738bd-5e4f-4e1c-8058-659fb016b57b
محل کتابخانه
Psychology
تاریخ
2020-11
یادداشتها
Buffett Early Childhood Fund (Educare Omaha) ; College of Education and Human Sciences, University of Nebraska (Educare Lincoln) ; University of Nebraska
متن نمونه
Research Findings: We examined low-income children's temperament (regulatory and reactive) as a predictor of their self-regulation, and teacher-child relationship (closeness and conflict) as a moderator of associations between child temperament and selfregulation. This study involved 291 children (132 girls) (Mage = 53.88 months, SD = 6.44 months) from three EduCare programs. Parents reported on children's temperament and teachers reported on qualities of teacher-child relationships during fall. Direct assessments of self-regulation were conducted during the following spring and summer. Hierarchical regression models using SAS PROCMIXED were employed to account for nesting of children within classrooms. Bivariate analyses revealed that teacher-child closeness was positively associated with children's self-regulation, and teacher-child conflict was inversely associated with children's self-regulation. After controlling for demographic variables, regression analyses showed that higher levels of conflict combined with lower temperamental regulation was related to lower self-regulation. Lower levels of child temperamental regulation was related to higher self-regulation when teacher-child conflict was low. Practice and Policy: Findings suggest that reducing conflictual teacher-child conflict could be beneficial for children's selfregulation, particularly for children with low regulatory temperament. A focus on enhancing teacher self-regulation, for example, through mindfulness practices, is a promising approach to reducing teacher-child conflict.
DOI
10.1080/10409289.2020.1830465
Cilt
32
