The sparkles of flowers in the explanation of the risings of lights
(MEBARİKU'l-EZHAR fi ŞERHİ MEŞARİKI'l-ENVAR)

Name: The sparkles of flowers in the explanation of the risings of lights
Author: Abd al-Latif ibn Abd al-Aziz ibn Amin al-Din ibn Fershta, al-Rumi, al-Kirmani, al-Hanafi, the teacher, Ibn Malik, the jurist

Title	The sparkles of flowers in the explanation of the risings of lights
Title Original	MEBARİKU'l-EZHAR fi ŞERHİ MEŞARİKI'l-ENVAR
Author	Abd al-Latif ibn Abd al-Aziz ibn Amin al-Din ibn Fershta, al-Rumi, al-Kirmani, al-Hanafi, the teacher, Ibn Malik, the jurist
Author Original	عبد اللطيف بن عبد العزيز بن أمين الدين بن فرشتا، الرومي، الكرماني، الحنفي، المدرس، ابن ملك، الفقيه
Subject	Religious Sciences \| -\| Hadith and its sciences -\| Serving the nation based on Sahih Imam Al-Bukhari \| -\| Explanations of combining the authentic and other authentic words - Explanations of combining the authentic and other authentic texts
Type	Book
Language	Arabic
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	Yes
Pages Count	124
Physical Dimensions	بها تعقيبه
Library:	Kashaf Albukhari
Record ID	130
Library Location	Sulaymaniyah, Istanbul, Türkiye
Notes	The first and last copy is missing and has many holes. #- There is whiteness in many places that were not noticed. He left a space of three-quarters of the page white and wrote on it: “True whiteness.” He wrote on the footnote on the first folio: “There are three leaves missing from here.” And on folio (96/b) he wrote on the footnote: “Missing from here is a tenth chapter and four books, the seventeenth, eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth, all amounting to thirty pages.” He wrote on the footnote of folio (122/b): “Missing from here is the twenty-fourth book, chapter one, second, third, and fourth, all of it, by the amount of one or two leaves.” And he wrote on the footnote at the last folio: “Missing here are two or two leaves.” Three". #- The title and author were taken from the extrapolation of the copy. \| The author of the book, Maher Taher Ismail Al-Barzanji, said about the time of writing the book: None of the authors of biographies and classes mentioned the time in which Ibn Malik wrote his book Mubariq al-Azhar, but he wrote it in the eighth century, and perhaps he wrote it before the middle of it, and God knows best.
Sample Text	...And our children, because he, peace be upon him, seeks for us, not for a purpose. The judge said, and from his love, peace be upon him, is to uphold his Sunnah and defend his law. He only mentioned the father and the child with their inclusion in the people by virtue of love. If you say, “How did it come?” I do preference here in the sense of the object, and its analogy was to be formulated for the subject. You said, “This is an illusion on your part because you saw that love is taken from the love of a thing by adding the h” if it becomes beloved... (Q. Anas. A slave does not believe until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself) that is, of the obedience and things that are permissible according to what was stated in Al-Naysaburi’s narration until he loves. For his brother of goodness what he likes for himself... ...It is only used in the evening of death. If you say, the use of resurrection came here in a narration, which is, I do not know... By his shock on the Day of Tur, or the resurrection of my heart. We said that the word resurrection is a metaphor for awakening, reconciling the two narratives on the Day of Resurrection, so I will be the first to awaken. So, I am Moses, that is, ambiguous about seeing Moses (he took a list), a deleted predicate, i.e. Moses took, and the nominal sentence is a form of Moses from the posts of the throne, so I do not know. He woke up. Delete the interrogative letter before me or is it applied to the construction of the unknown like the hamza at the end of it? It is sufficient to stun the stage... There is nothing of this meaning in it... Abu Hurairah, may God be pleased with him, they agreed on the roma of a newborn being born...
Başlık Kaynağı	الأعلام 4/59 - كشف الظنون 2/1690 - معجم المؤلفين 6/11 - هدية العارفين 1/617
Müellif ve Başlık Kaynağı	تحفة الأحوذي مقدمة ص 136، كشف الظنون م 1 ص 1 23 وص 375، الشقائق النعمانية. الفوائد البهية ص 107 شذرات الذهب م 7 ص 342 الضوء اللامع م 4 ص 329، هدية العارفين م 1 ص 617
Müellifin Diğer Adları	ابن ملك، عبد اللطيف بن عبد العزيز
Eser Telif Bitiş Yüzyılı (Hicri)	الثامن
Müellif Vefat Yüzyılı (Hicri)	التاسع
Alt Kütüphane Adı	جار الله أفندي
Nüsha Durumu	مفردة
Alt Kütüphane Kayıt No	364
Alt Kütüphane Yeri (Ülke)	تركيا
Alt Kütüphane Yeri (Şehir)	استانبول
İstinsah Bitiş Yüzyılı (Hicri)	العاشر
Nüsha Değeri	نسخة حسنة
Yazı Tarihi	متأخر#متأخر#متأخر
Yazı Boyutu	خط متوسط
Satır Sayısı	31
Cilt Rengi	بني
Mürekkep Rengi	أسود#احمر#احمر
Cilt Türü	تجليد كرتوني
Yazı Türü	تعليق
Materyal Türü	ورق
Yazı Tanımı	جيد
Yazı Okunaklılığı	واضح
Diğer Konu	العلوم الدينية \| الحديث وعلومه \| شروح الحديث \| الشروح العامة
Diğer Konu 2	العلوم الدينية \| الحديث وعلومه \| الجمع بين كتب الحديث

View in source Kashaf Albukhari Kashaf Albukhari - Ottoman library catalog search

Kashaf Albukhari

The sparkles of flowers in the explanation of the risings of lights

(MEBARİKU'l-EZHAR fi ŞERHİ MEŞARİKI'l-ENVAR)

Author Abd al-Latif ibn Abd al-Aziz ibn Amin al-Din ibn Fershta, al-Rumi, al-Kirmani, al-Hanafi, the teacher, Ibn Malik, the jurist

Author Original عبد اللطيف بن عبد العزيز بن أمين الدين بن فرشتا، الرومي، الكرماني، الحنفي، المدرس، ابن ملك، الفقيه

Type Book

Language Arabic

Digital Yes

Manuscript Yes

Pages Count 124

Physical Dimensions بها تعقيبه

Library Kashaf Albukhari

Record ID 130

Library Location Sulaymaniyah, Istanbul, Türkiye

Notes The first and last copy is missing and has many holes. #- There is whiteness in many places that were not noticed. He left a space of three-quarters of the page white and wrote on it: “True whiteness.” He wrote on the footnote on the first folio: “There are three leaves missing from here.” And on folio (96/b) he wrote on the footnote: “Missing from here is a tenth chapter and four books, the seventeenth, eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth, all amounting to thirty pages.” He wrote on the footnote of folio (122/b): “Missing from here is the twenty-fourth book, chapter one, second, third, and fourth, all of it, by the amount of one or two leaves.” And he wrote on the footnote at the last folio: “Missing here are two or two leaves.” Three". #- The title and author were taken from the extrapolation of the copy. | The author of the book, Maher Taher Ismail Al-Barzanji, said about the time of writing the book: None of the authors of biographies and classes mentioned the time in which Ibn Malik wrote his book Mubariq al-Azhar, but he wrote it in the eighth century, and perhaps he wrote it before the middle of it, and God knows best.

Sample Text ...And our children, because he, peace be upon him, seeks for us, not for a purpose. The judge said, and from his love, peace be upon him, is to uphold his Sunnah and defend his law. He only mentioned the father and the child with their inclusion in the people by virtue of love. If you say, “How did it come?” I do preference here in the sense of the object, and its analogy was to be formulated for the subject. You said, “This is an illusion on your part because you saw that love is taken from the love of a thing by adding the h” if it becomes beloved... (Q. Anas. A slave does not believe until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself) that is, of the obedience and things that are permissible according to what was stated in Al-Naysaburi’s narration until he loves. For his brother of goodness what he likes for himself... ...It is only used in the evening of death. If you say, the use of resurrection came here in a narration, which is, I do not know... By his shock on the Day of Tur, or the resurrection of my heart. We said that the word resurrection is a metaphor for awakening, reconciling the two narratives on the Day of Resurrection, so I will be the first to awaken. So, I am Moses, that is, ambiguous about seeing Moses (he took a list), a deleted predicate, i.e. Moses took, and the nominal sentence is a form of Moses from the posts of the throne, so I do not know. He woke up. Delete the interrogative letter before me or is it applied to the construction of the unknown like the hamza at the end of it? It is sufficient to stun the stage... There is nothing of this meaning in it... Abu Hurairah, may God be pleased with him, they agreed on the roma of a newborn being born...

Başlık Kaynağı الأعلام 4/59 - كشف الظنون 2/1690 - معجم المؤلفين 6/11 - هدية العارفين 1/617

Müellif ve Başlık Kaynağı تحفة الأحوذي مقدمة ص 136، كشف الظنون م 1 ص 1 23 وص 375، الشقائق النعمانية. الفوائد البهية ص 107 شذرات الذهب م 7 ص 342 الضوء اللامع م 4 ص 329، هدية العارفين م 1 ص 617

Müellifin Diğer Adları ابن ملك، عبد اللطيف بن عبد العزيز

Eser Telif Bitiş Yüzyılı (Hicri) الثامن

Müellif Vefat Yüzyılı (Hicri) التاسع

Alt Kütüphane Adı جار الله أفندي

Nüsha Durumu مفردة

Alt Kütüphane Kayıt No 364

Alt Kütüphane Yeri (Ülke) تركيا

Alt Kütüphane Yeri (Şehir) استانبول

İstinsah Bitiş Yüzyılı (Hicri) العاشر

Nüsha Değeri نسخة حسنة

Yazı Tarihi متأخر#متأخر#متأخر

Yazı Boyutu خط متوسط

Satır Sayısı 31

Cilt Rengi بني

Mürekkep Rengi أسود#احمر#احمر

Cilt Türü تجليد كرتوني

Yazı Türü تعليق

Materyal Türü ورق

Yazı Tanımı جيد

Yazı Okunaklılığı واضح

Diğer Konu العلوم الدينية | الحديث وعلومه | شروح الحديث | الشروح العامة

Diğer Konu 2 العلوم الدينية | الحديث وعلومه | الجمع بين كتب الحديث