Author
Muhammed Mustafa Yilmaz
Publication Place
Giresun University -
Giresun University
Subject
İdrak Journal of Religious Research, 2024-06, Vol.4 (1), p.169-209
Type
Book
Language
Arabic
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
EISSN: 2791-6693, DOI: 10.62297/idrak.1369359
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f7538687fa34149a640fe8eeec0b1fd
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes
This article is a study based on the hadith "...Muslims are like a hand towards those other than themselves, the most ordinary one of them can give aman on their behalf...", which is mentioned as evidence on the subject of eman. In the article, the hadith of eman was tried to be examined in two parts: in the context of hadith technique and fiqh. In terms of hadith technique, the hadith of Eman was transcribed, the narrators of the companions, the differences in the wording of the narration were identified, and the isnads that emerged through the narration were shown in tables. The judgments of the hadith scholars about the narrators in the isnads were researched and the narrators who were the subject of cerh and the topics of cerh were tried to be determined. From a fiqh perspective, the hadith of eman was examined by bringing the ahl al-ray to the fore. Due to the environment in which they emerged, Ahl al-Ray gave more space to reason and tried to evaluate issues through the filter of reason. Among the fiqh sects, this understanding was mostly implemented by Hanafis. For this reason, in the article, instead of examining the hadith of eman comparatively according to fiqh sects, it has tried to be discussed specifically in the Hanafi sect in the context of ahl al-ray. In the article, answers will be sought to the questions of what is the authenticity of the hadith mentioned as evidence on the subject of eman and in what ways the Hanafis used reason on this issue in the context of ahl al-ray. Thus, Hanafis tried to deal with the subject of eman on issues such as the reason on which eman is based (the benefit of eman), who can give eman, who covers the eman given to non-Muslims and the corruption of eman. In the article, it has been tried to examine the hadith of eman in two sections, in the context of hadith technique and fiqh. In terms of hadith technique, the hadith of eman has been analyzed, the narrators of the companions, the verbal differences of the narration have been identified, and the attributions that arise from the falsification are shown with tables. The judgments of the hadith scholars about the narrators in the isnads were researched and the narrators who were the subject of cerh and the topics of cerh were tried to be determined. From a fiqh perspective, the hadith of eman was examined by bringing the ahl al-ray to the fore. Ahl al-ray gave more space to the mind because of the environment in which she appeared, and tried to evaluate problems by passing them through a mental filter. Among the fiqh sects, this understanding was mostly implemented by Hanafis. For this reason, in the article, instead of examining the hadith of eman in a comparative way according to fiqh sects, an attempt has been made to address it specifically in the Hanafi sect in the context of ahl al-ray. In the article, answers will be sought to the questions of what is the authenticity of the hadith mentioned as evidence on the subject of eman and in what ways the Hanafis used reason on this issue in the context of ahl al-ray. Thus, the Hanafis tried to process the subject of eman on issues such as the justification on which eman is based (the task of eman), who can give eman, who covers the eman given to non-Muslims, and the deterioration of eman.
Detaylı Başlık
Eman Hadisi: Hadis Tekniği ve Ehl-i Rey Bağlamında Hanefî Fıkhı Açısından Bir Analiz
