Author
Recep Cetintaş
Publication Place
Presidency of Religious Affairs -
Presidency of Religious Affairs
Subject
Diyanet scientific journal, 2020-03, Vol.56 (1), p.39-66
Type
Book
Language
ara,tur
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 1300-8498, DOI: 10.61304/did.620354
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_237aa80025c64bd1beecc40181351ef1
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes
Ijma, Hz. It is a concept that expresses the consensus of mujtahid scholars regarding the ruling of a religious issue in any period after the death of the Prophet. Ijma, which is used in fiqh books to ground the legitimacy of religious and legal provisions and is ranked third in the hierarchy of evidence in fiqh procedural works, after the Quran and the Sunnah, is one of the basic sources of Islamic law. However, ijma is not a source that creates judgments on its own, but has the feature of being a document that protects the provisions based on definitive texts and ensures that they are taken as a basis in religious interpretations, gives certainty to the provisions based on hypothetical texts, and gathers Muslims around common religious values. With the codification of the fiqh procedure, scholars have addressed the issues of the nature of ijma, its basis, its value as proof, and whether it can be the subject of abrogation. They created a theory of ijma by focusing on this. In this context, there have been differences of opinion among proceduralists regarding other evidences of ijma and whether other evidences can abrogate ijma. The majority of proceduralists have adopted the view that none of these possibilities are possible. Some scholars belonging to different schools opposed the majority on this issue.
Detaylı Başlık
FIKIH USÛLÜNDE NÂSİH VE MENSUH OLMA YÖNÜNDEN İCMÂ
