Author
ÇALIŞKAN BAŞER, Hatice Merve
Publication Place
Mardin Artuklu University -
Mardin Artuklu University
Subject
Artuklu Akademi, 2023-06, Vol.10 (1), p.17-29
Type
Book
Language
ara,eng
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 2148-3264, EISSN: 2687-427X, DOI: 10.34247/artukluakademi.1269481
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_66e783a00b9646cba493003574a688f9
Library Location
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Notes
Tafsir narration, which consists of transferring the information in the narrations; mind, language etc. Although the interpretation in which the elements come to the fore is called the interpretation of wisdom, they have been understood in different ways. This situation, which began to be classified with the works of Zehebî (d. 1977), does not allow clear boundaries to be drawn and causes some ambiguous situations. The subject of the study is to reveal the possibility of the distinction between narration and dirāyah, based on the interpretation style of Muqātil, who is the author of the first fully extant commentary and who does not mention it in some places while using narration. The aim of the study is to present the problematic aspect of the issue, which is considered a part of the science of tafsir today, by concretizing it through a tafsir. In the article, tafsir was examined with the document analysis technique of the qualitative research method. The findings were examined in comparison with the narrations. Commentaries defined as dirayat can use narrations with or without evidence or without mentioning any information. On the other hand, choosing the narrations to be included in the works called narration tafsir, indicating the preference among them and associating the verse with the narrations are examples of astuteness. Muqātil also included them in some places without stating that they were narrations and benefited from them in different ways for an original interpretation. Narration to tafsir, which is formed by transferring the information in the narrations; mind, language, etc. The tafsir in which the elements come to the fore is called the dirâyah tafsir. This subject, which started to be classified with the works of Zehebî(d.1977), causes some ambiguous situations. The subject of the study is to reveal the possibility of the distinction between narration and wisdom, based on the ta'wil style of Muqâtil, who does not mention it in some places while using narration. In the study, it is aimed to reveal a problematic aspect of the science of interpretation by concretizing it today. In the article, tafsir was examined with the document analysis technique of the qualitative research method. Tafsir, which is defined as dirâyah, can use narration without mentioning any information. But choosing the narrations to be included in the works called narration tafsir, specifying the preference among them and associating the verse with the narrations are examples of insight. Muqâtil also included them in some places without stating that there were narrations and benefited from them in different ways for an original interpretation.
Detaylı Başlık
Mukâtil b. Süleymân’ın Tefsir Yönteminden Hareketle Tefsirde Rivayet-Dirayet Ayrımının İmkânı Üzerine
