Author
Make Yetkin
Publication Place
Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University -
Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University
Subject
Usul Islamic Studies, 2017-10, Vol.28 (28), p.183-212
Type
Book
Language
Arabic
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 1305-2632, DOI: 10.56361/usul.508334
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b504ee2219dd4cdbae3953a5bf6fc240
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes
The issue of naskh has been the subject of debates reflected in the literature since the very early periods of Islamic sciences. One of the many points of discussion regarding abrogation is the issue of the sunnah of the Quran and whether the sunnah can abrogate the Quran. Imam Shafii (d. 204/820) says that the Quran and the Sunnah cannot contradict each other, since these two are not similar to each other. Shafi'i's opinion was not adopted regarding the abrogation of the sunnah of the Quran, and both Hanafi and Shafi'i methodologists who came later accepted the abrogation of the sunnah of the Quran. Although Hanafis still oppose Imam Shafi'i regarding the abrogation of the Quran by the Sunnah, Shafi'i scholars have adopted different attitudes. In this study, it has been tried to determine the difference in understanding at the source of the debate by examining the views and evidence of the main Hanafi and Shafi'i scholars from Imam Shafi'i to the Classical Period on the subject of the abrogation of the Quran and the Sunnah. Abstract: The phenomenon of abrogation (naskh) has been subject to disputes since the emergence of Islamic sciences. One of the pointsthat has been discussed is whether a Quranic text can abrogate a sunnah and viceversa. Shafi argues that these two can not abrogate each other since they are not each other's counterpart. Neither Hanafis nor Shafis after Shafi embracedhis views about the abrogation of sunnah by Quran. On the other hand, the abrogation of Quran by sunnah was more controversial. Hanafis agreed thatsunnah can abrogate the Quran as well. However, some of the Shafi jurists rejected it like Shafi himself; while some other Shafis acknowledged that it is plausible. In this paper, it is aimed to determine the foundation of the dispute, via investigating the perspectives of prominent Hanafis and Shafis fromShafi to the classical period.
Detaylı Başlık
Klâsik Dönem’e Kadar Fıkıh Usûlünde Kur’ân ve Sünnetin Birbirini Neshi Tartışması
