Author
Zishan Türcan
Publication Place
Presidency of Religious Affairs -
Presidency of Religious Affairs
Subject
Diyanet scientific journal, 2021-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1091-1114
Type
Book
Language
ara,tur
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 1300-8498, DOI: 10.61304/did.1017045
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_569ae28822744adfadca818a8696b342
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes
Hz. The fact that the Prophet's words began to be conveyed through narration brought the approaches to the relationship between the Quran and the Sunnah to a methodical basis that centered on the issue of information value. Hadith scholars objected to those who tended to invalidate the hadith/sunnah on the grounds that it is unified news, and emphasized the authoritative nature of the sunnah. They showed in their works written in this direction that the faith and fiqh issues should be based on narration against the theologians and the people of ra'. However, it is interesting that the hadith works classified in the first four centuries of the Hijri do not include almost any independent verses, even though they were also an answer to the discussions about hadith. So what is the reason for this? On the other hand, how should this exceptional attitude of Bukhari, who gave a lot of place to verses under chapter headings among hadith scholars, be interpreted? In the study, it was concluded that the idea that the sunnah contains the content of the Quran was effective in not feeling the need to cite separate verses in the narration al-hadith works. It has been determined that one of the main reasons for Bukhari's exceptional attitude was to cover the content of the hadiths, which he could not include in his work due to health conditions, with verses.
Detaylı Başlık
HADİSÇİLERİN KUR’ÂN-SÜNNET İLİŞKİSİNE DAİR DÜŞÜNCELERİNİN HADİS MUSANNEFATINA YANSIMASI -SAHÎHU’L-BUHÂRÎ ÖRNEĞİ
