Examination of some Envârü't-Tenzîl annotations regarding the position of Tafsir among religious sciences

Name: Examination of some Envârü't-Tenzîl annotations regarding the position of Tafsir among religious sciences
Author: Büyük, Enes, Kara, Ömer

Title	Examination of some Envârü't-Tenzîl annotations regarding the position of Tafsir among religious sciences
Author	Büyük, Enes, Kara, Ömer
Publication Place	Erzurum: Atatürk University Faculty of Theology - Erzurum: Atatürk University Faculty of Theology
Subject	Journal of Theology Studies, 2020-12, Vol.2020 (54), p.203-228
Type	kitap
Language	ara,tur
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	No
Library:	Leitir Library
Library Asset ID	ISSN: 2458-7508, EISSN: 2602-3946, DOI: 10.29288/ilted.743708
Record ID	cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45880c612b8f43b5b1ae933ce7f81a0e
Library Location	ProQuest Central, DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes	After the Islamic sciences were compiled, an attempt was made to ensure the hierarchy between them. Among these sciences, some problems of the science of tafsir have been taken into consideration and examined, even if they are in later sources, since the Quran is the subject of research with the aim of revealing the divine purpose. Among the sources where issues related to interpretation are discussed and examined, the introduction of Beyzâvî's commentary named Envârü't-tenzîl played an important role. Because the commentaries written on this tafsir reveal its influence on subsequent literature. In his introduction to tafsir, Bayzāwī presents tafsir as the most sublime of religious sciences, and then, on the one hand, accepts it as the original of sciences since it constitutes the basis of religious rules, and on the other hand, requires being proficient in religious and literary sciences in order to do tafsir. Depending on these judgments, in the commentaries and annotations, the question of how tafsir is a superior science, and specifically its superiority over the sciences of kalam and hadith, is discussed. In addition, the problem that tafsir comes before these sciences because it forms the basis of religious sciences and that the acceptance that tafsir can only be made with help from them places tafsir after those sciences is discussed. This article aims to examine the aforementioned problems.
Detaylı Başlık	Tefsir’in dini ilimler arasındaki konumuna dair bazı Envârü’t-Tenzîl hâşiyelerinin incelenmesi

View in source Leitir Library Leitir Library - Ottoman library catalog search

Leitir Library

Examination of some Envârü't-Tenzîl annotations regarding the position of Tafsir among religious sciences

Author Büyük, Enes, Kara, Ömer

Publication Place Erzurum: Atatürk University Faculty of Theology - Erzurum: Atatürk University Faculty of Theology

Subject Journal of Theology Studies, 2020-12, Vol.2020 (54), p.203-228

Type kitap

Language ara,tur

Digital Yes

Manuscript No

Library Leitir Library

Library Asset ID ISSN: 2458-7508, EISSN: 2602-3946, DOI: 10.29288/ilted.743708

Record ID cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45880c612b8f43b5b1ae933ce7f81a0e

Library Location ProQuest Central, DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

Notes After the Islamic sciences were compiled, an attempt was made to ensure the hierarchy between them. Among these sciences, some problems of the science of tafsir have been taken into consideration and examined, even if they are in later sources, since the Quran is the subject of research with the aim of revealing the divine purpose. Among the sources where issues related to interpretation are discussed and examined, the introduction of Beyzâvî's commentary named Envârü't-tenzîl played an important role. Because the commentaries written on this tafsir reveal its influence on subsequent literature. In his introduction to tafsir, Bayzāwī presents tafsir as the most sublime of religious sciences, and then, on the one hand, accepts it as the original of sciences since it constitutes the basis of religious rules, and on the other hand, requires being proficient in religious and literary sciences in order to do tafsir. Depending on these judgments, in the commentaries and annotations, the question of how tafsir is a superior science, and specifically its superiority over the sciences of kalam and hadith, is discussed. In addition, the problem that tafsir comes before these sciences because it forms the basis of religious sciences and that the acceptance that tafsir can only be made with help from them places tafsir after those sciences is discussed. This article aims to examine the aforementioned problems.

Detaylı Başlık Tefsir’in dini ilimler arasındaki konumuna dair bazı Envârü’t-Tenzîl hâşiyelerinin incelenmesi