Author
Ibn al-Muhib al-Samit, Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Muhib al-Din Abi Muhammad Abdullah ibn Ahmad al-Maqdisi al-Salhi, 789 AH/1387 AD.
Author Original
ابن المحب الصامت، أبو بكر محمد بن محب الدين أبي محمد عبد الله بن أحمد المقدسي الصالحي، هـم
Publication Date
Not available
Publication Place
Damascus - Syria -
Al-Hafiz Ibn Al-Muhib
Subject
Translations.
Type
kitap
Language
Arabic
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
Yes
Pages Count
24
Library
Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation
Library Asset ID
مجموع 47
Record ID
157784
Library Location
Syria (Damascus) - Dar Al-Kutob Al-Dhahiria Library - Syria (Damascus) - Dar Al-Kutob Al-Dhahiria Library
Date
Not available
Notes
Manuscript written by the author; The author is an austere Hafiz, born in 712. The order of the confused papers is as follows: (147, 168, 167, 135 - 137, 169, 138 - 143, 170, 144 - 147, 172, 148, 166, 173). There is nothing in it that makes it appear that the part is by the son of a lover except for two things: The first: that it is in his handwriting, and it is like his handwriting in the following huge book: “The Attributes of the Lord of the Worlds.” The second: He said in paper 167/2: “This was narrated by our Sheikh Abu Al-Hajjaj Al-Hafiz and others.” So we know from that that the author of the part is one of the students of this Al-Hafiz Abu Al-Hajjaj, and he is Al-Mizzi Yusuf bin Abdul Rahman. It was possible that the author of the part was Al-Hafiz Al-Dhahabi, as he was also a student of Al-Mizzi. However, his handwriting is not his handwriting, although there is a great similarity between them that requires a lot of contemplation to differentiate between them, and it is not the handwriting of Al-Hafiz Al-Barzali Alam Al-Din as he imagined. Professor Youssef Al-Ash wrote in his Index (p. 46) and attributed that part to him, even though he was not certain of it. Rather, he said: “Perhaps it is his.” I also wondered about his time, and at first I thought that the part was by Al-Hafiz Al-Dia’ Al-Maqdisi when I saw Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar saying at the end of his explanation of: “Chapter on naming those named from the people of Badr in Al-Jami’” from “Sahih Al-Bukhari” (8/253): “Al-Bukhari had previously arranged the people of Badr according to the letters of the dictionary, and it was more accurate to accommodate their names, but he limited himself to what he found of them, and Al-Hafiz Dhiya Al-Din Al-Maqdisi comprehended them in “The Book of Rules” and explained it. The people of the biography differ from each other.” I said: I thought so because this description completely applies to the part mentioned, then I retracted it when I saw two things in it: The first: that his sheikh Abu Al-Hajjaj Al-Mizzi mentioned in it, as mentioned above, and he was about a century behind Al-Diya. The other: I saw the author mentioned Al-Diya’ Al-Maqdisi in the margin of the paper (170/2), saying: “What Abu Abdullah Al-Maqdisi mentioned in this translation has ended, and some of that has been considered.”
Durum
مخرومة أصابها الحرق من أسفلها فذهب ببعض سطورها، وأوراقها مشوشة الترتيب.
