Author
Bioud, Mohamed Ali
Publication Date
2022
Publication Place
sakarya -
Sakarya University
Subject
Fakih And Sultan, Political Consultation, Political Obedience Literature, Mihne Where Faqihs Live, Religious And Political, Sheikh-al-Islam Institution, Fakih And Sultan, Literature Of Political Obedience, Plights Of Jurists, Spiritual And Temporal Authority, Sheikh Of Islam
Type
Document
Language
Arabic
Digital
No
Manuscript
No
Physical Dimensions
x, 319 yaprak : şekil, tablo ; 30 cm.
Library
Sakarya University Central Library
Library Asset ID
0464350
Record ID
2107139
Library Location
SAU [A] Central Library - Thesis Collection
Date
2022
Notes
Contains bibliographic information.
The thesis is available electronically.
Sample Text
Throughout our long experience of Islamic politics with the periods of sultanate and Islamic caliphate, jurists had very effective scientific authority. As a matter of fact, jurists were important people who acted as intermediaries between the people and the state as the voice of sharia and the majority of the people, representatives of the ummah, and the fatwa authority was of critical importance at that time. Because the fuqaha were legally and morally responsible not to the ruler and his interests, but to the society in which he lived. However, the ruler still needed the jurists to give more legitimacy to his political decisions. Because sharia demands the ruler to manage the worldly affairs of the ummah and look after the interests of the people, under the control of the jurists or with their opposition and support. This study; It sheds light on the relationship between the scholars and the ruler, or the relationship between the scientific authority and the executive authority. This relationship; It was distinguished by the differences between views such as alienation, political opposition, conflict and the resulting fuqaha mihna, and cooperation to overcome the great difficulties faced by the state and to protect the interests of the society. When we examine these relations, the following fuqaha profiles emerge: Ruler faqih, Fakih Mestevzir (fakih Mestevzir (faqih who accepted the vizierate), Fakih Muhtesib (from Hisbe or consultant faqih), revolutionary jurisprudence, political ecclesiastical jurisprudence, state jurisprudence, Tabrir jurisprudence (i.e. pro-ruler jurist). The study consists of three parts. The first part is the theoretical introduction with historical depth. Second part; It examines theories of the relationship between rulers and jurists and between politicians of different levels. The most violent of these theories is revolution and conflict, which has led to the proliferation of literature on political rationalization and political obedience. This chapter is divided into six basic parts. Then, the applied part examining the Shaykh al-Islam model in the Ottoman political experience, where the official jurist meets the sultan and the ruling circles and creates a unique model of the hierarchical relationship between them, is discussed. The study took into account the historical contexts in which the theories were obtained in the periods examined and also referred to original or translated Turkish sources, from Arabic literature to orientalist research.
Throughout our long Islamic political experience in various vagaries of the Royal States or the stages of the Islamic caliphate, jurists have had heavy scientific authority, representing the voice of legitimacy and main theologians. They were important mediators as representatives of the Ummah. Their power of fate was decisive, as the jurist was legally and morally responsible for the society in which he lived and not for the Governor and his interests. However, he was needed by the Sultan to add greater legitimacy to his ruling political behavior. Sharia law may require the Governor to administer the worldly affairs of the nation and take care of Muslims' interests before the jurist (Fakih) oversight, opposition, support, and attribution. Hence, this study highlighted the relationship between jurist and sultan or the relationship between scientific authority and executive power, or the relationship between spiritual authority and temporal authority. This relationship was characterized by a discrepancy between the vision of detachment, such as isolation, political opposition, or confrontation, and the resulting plight of jurists, and cooperation to meet major state challenges and take care of the nation's interests. Across these different relationships, different patterns of scholars have been produced: Fakih Al-Sultan, Fakih Al-Mastour, Fakih Al-Mohtassib, Fakih Al-Thawra, Fakih Al-Ozla Siyassiya, Fakih Al-Dawla, Fakih Tabrir, and Fakih Taghalob. The study was divided into three chapters, the first being a theoretical introduction with historical depth, and the second examining the different theories of the relationship between jurist and sultan among the various levels; from the extreme, namely, revolution and confrontation to the opposite, namely political justification and publication of political obedience literature, which are six basic directions. The third chapter is an applied chapter in which the Sheikh of Islam model is studied in the Ottoman political experience, as well as the case of the official Fakih meeting with the Sultan and the bodies of power, and making a unique model of the hierarchical relationship of jobs between them.
Anabilim Dalı
Temel İslam Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı
Tez
Sakarya Üniversitesi
Yayın Geliş Tarihi
27.01.2023
Alt Tür
Doktora
Durum
Çevrimiçi Referans Kitabı
Ortam
HardDisk
Şekil
Elektronik
