Publication Date
27/12/1871 — 14/10/1288
Subject
Click Theft Lawsuits - Silver
Type
belge
Language
Arabic
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
King Abdul-Aziz Al Saoud Foundation for Islamic Studies and Human Sciences
Record ID
display14152
Date
27/12/1871 — 14/10/1288
Notes
Praise be to God, after the confession of Sidi Muhammad bin Al-Sayyid Hammad, the jazz industry, that his mother, Zainat, daughter of Hajj Qaddour bin Kiran, borrowed from people jewelry, two wives, silver coins, and his prison, Marjan, with camouflaged silver stars, two gold coins, and two silver and raw anklets, and she pawned it with people also in Mighty Mithqal in the second and thirty-four old mithqals. He attended, and inside it was Al-Issawi bin Al-Hajj Idris bin Kiran. He agreed to that and they testified. He has the rulings obligating him to perform the aforementioned Iddah on behalf of his aforementioned aunt until he collects it from her in order to ward off this corruption and to preserve people’s money, acknowledging that he did it from his pure and pure money and that the described jewelry was left with a trustee until it is in the possession of its masters at the hands of the one who has the rulings, may God protect him. And when the son of the aforementioned woman was imprisoned and mentioned in the aforementioned case, and the aforementioned woman’s brother’s son requested from him what came out of his hand of the Iddah that he was obligated to perform, an agreement was concluded between them that he would pay. The aforementioned child belongs to his maternal uncle’s son, from the Iddah that came out of his hand, one hundred mithqals in individual cases and thirty mithqals of old, and he is equal to his uncle in the rest for God Almighty and the father-in-law. They testified from the aforementioned Issawi that he received from the aforementioned child all the Iddah that was settled for it in full, secured by inspection and confession, and he exonerated his aunt, her child, and his father, who is the aforementioned Khami, from the remainder that was forgiven in a complete way, so that none of them would ever demand it. They also testified that the boy paid that from his own money. Sincerely for him, and that he was committed to repaying it on her behalf before they knew his fate, he was fully attested by her from those who knew the woman’s child, and some of them were in a state of imprisonment and knew about them. On the fourteenth of Shawwal in the year two hundred and eighty-eight, and a thousand servants of his Lord, praise be to God, the student overseer, Mr. Muhammad Fatha bin Al-Hajj Ali Al-Tarnabati, testified that he possessed from the hand of Hajj Al-Jalali Abu Khabza all the two aforementioned anklets at that time, because they were his after he had turned them over and identified them in complete possession, in the presence of the woman’s child around him, as Sidi Muhammad bin Al-Tarnabati testified. Hajj Al-Tayeb Al-Jishi said that he possessed from the hand of the person he mentioned all your cash registers in the middle of Jawhar because they were his and, among other things, he had mortgaged about him a quintal of possession, a complete and tangible possession with the consent of the aforementioned boy. Hajj Faddoul Ibn Sidi Muhammad Al-Amiri also testified that he possessed from the hand of the person he mentioned the two acorns of gold because they were his, by his confession, a complete and tangible possession, just as Sharif Sidi Muhammad bin Sharif Sidi Idris Al-Idrissi testified from the hand of the person who mentioned two silver buckets of what he mentioned about him being a complete and tangible possession. Al-Sayyid Al-Tahir also testified from the student Muhammad Al-Buri that he had obtained a complete and visible possession from the hand of the person who mentioned all the coral fat described to him on behalf of Al-Sayyid Abd Al-Wahhab bin Al-Sayyid Muhammad Bennis. Al-Hajj Allal bin Al-Sayyid Al-Makki also testified that all the remaining Bermlous around him had obtained a complete, in-person possession from the hand of the one he mentioned with the consent of the boy in all of them. Al-Sayyid Ahmed bin Al-Hajj Abdul Wahid Al-Hilu also witnessed the raw material in his possession and showed it in his possession in person in the report of the aforementioned boy. Because of that, every one of those mentioned testified that he did not accept the woman mentioned above, except what he had acquired, as he mentioned, and that they acquitted her, and she was completely acquitted of that. They knew his fate. He testified against them in their entirety and Harf, and in the middle of Shawwal in the year two hundred and eighty-eight and two hundred thousandths of the truth, that he had acquired it three times. Al-Jalali made amends. They knew.
