Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views | Kütüphane.osmanlica.com
Aramaya Dön

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

İsim Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views
Yazar Ghodratollah Ghorbani
Basım Yeri Research Institute of Hawzah and University (RIHU) - Research Institute of Hawzah and University (RIHU)
Konu Economic indicators, Social Factors
Tür Süreli Yayın
Dil Arapça
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane: Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Demirbaş Numarası ISSN: 2322-2506, EISSN: 2588-4700
Kayıt Numarası cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_77a42aeff25b4905aadc18645c2507fc
Notlar The aim of this research is to infer the role of social factors in the creation of human knowledge in Al-Ghazālī (c.1056–1111) and Ibn-Khaldun's (c.1332–1406) views with a comparative approach. The method of this research is comparative analysis of Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's understandings of this phenomenon through reviewing and scrutinizing their views. Findings of this study show that the relationship between knowledge and society is one of the main concerns of these two Muslim philosophers. They both have tried to investigate how social factors influence various levels of human knowledge. In the view of Ibn-Khaldun, the division of people into rural population and urban population is based on a variety of social factors. But from the viewpoint of Al-Ghazali, the division of human beings into common people, theologians and mystics refers to their knowledge system which can be influenced by social factors. Results demonstrate that while Al-Ghazali notices the role of social factors as barriers to the realization of genuine knowledge, he determines their function in the formation of human knowledge such as jurisprudence, theology and politics. Ghazali in his approach mainly attempts to display negative aspects of social factors of knowledge formation and development. On the contrary, Ibn-Khaldun tries to explore the diversity of social factors such as Asabyyat (mostly known as tribal solidarity), geographical situation, economy, religion and environment with a realistic approach using an objective experience. He expresses both positive and negative roles and endeavors to show their impact just in the form of knowledge and not its content.
Atıf Kaynağı DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Bir Parçası Olduğu Islām va ʻulūm-i ijtimāʻī (Online), 1394-06, Vol.7 (13), p.139-165
Kaynağa git Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri Purdue University Libraries

Diğer Nüshalar

11

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Detayları görüntüle
Aramaya Dön
Purdue University Libraries Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Kaynağa git

Comparative analysis of the function of social factors affecting knowledge in Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's views

Yazar Ghodratollah Ghorbani
Basım Yeri Research Institute of Hawzah and University (RIHU) - Research Institute of Hawzah and University (RIHU)
Konu Economic indicators, Social Factors
Tür Süreli Yayın
Dil Arapça
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Demirbaş Numarası ISSN: 2322-2506, EISSN: 2588-4700
Kayıt Numarası cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_77a42aeff25b4905aadc18645c2507fc
Notlar The aim of this research is to infer the role of social factors in the creation of human knowledge in Al-Ghazālī (c.1056–1111) and Ibn-Khaldun's (c.1332–1406) views with a comparative approach. The method of this research is comparative analysis of Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's understandings of this phenomenon through reviewing and scrutinizing their views. Findings of this study show that the relationship between knowledge and society is one of the main concerns of these two Muslim philosophers. They both have tried to investigate how social factors influence various levels of human knowledge. In the view of Ibn-Khaldun, the division of people into rural population and urban population is based on a variety of social factors. But from the viewpoint of Al-Ghazali, the division of human beings into common people, theologians and mystics refers to their knowledge system which can be influenced by social factors. Results demonstrate that while Al-Ghazali notices the role of social factors as barriers to the realization of genuine knowledge, he determines their function in the formation of human knowledge such as jurisprudence, theology and politics. Ghazali in his approach mainly attempts to display negative aspects of social factors of knowledge formation and development. On the contrary, Ibn-Khaldun tries to explore the diversity of social factors such as Asabyyat (mostly known as tribal solidarity), geographical situation, economy, religion and environment with a realistic approach using an objective experience. He expresses both positive and negative roles and endeavors to show their impact just in the form of knowledge and not its content.
Atıf Kaynağı DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Bir Parçası Olduğu Islām va ʻulūm-i ijtimāʻī (Online), 1394-06, Vol.7 (13), p.139-165

Diğer Nüshalar

11

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Comparative analysis of the function ...

Purdue University Libraries
Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri yönlendiriliyorsunuz...

Lütfen bekleyiniz.