Positive energy districts: Identifying challenges and interdependencies

Name: Positive energy districts: Identifying challenges and interdependencies
Author: Krangsås, S. G., Steemers, K., Konstantinou, T., Soutullo, S., Liu, M., Giancola, E., Prebreza, B., Ashrafian Bonab, Touraj, Murauskaitė, L., Maas, N.

İsim	Positive energy districts: Identifying challenges and interdependencies
Yazar	Krangsås, S. G., Steemers, K., Konstantinou, T., Soutullo, S., Liu, M., Giancola, E., Prebreza, B., Ashrafian Bonab, Touraj, Murauskaitė, L., Maas, N.
Basım Tarihi:	2021-10
Basım Yeri	- MDPI
Konu	Challenges, Collaboration, Cost action, Governance, Market, Needs, Participation, Positive energy district, Tools
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	2071-1050
Kayıt Numarası	4eda53f5-1d63-4a0e-906f-0c6be31426cf
Lokasyon	Architecture
Tarih	2021-10
Notlar	European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Örnek Metin	Positive Energy Districts (PED) are areas within cities that generate more renewable energy than they consume, contributing to cities’ energy system transformation toward carbon neutrality. Since PED is a novel concept, the implementation is very challenging. Within the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action, which offers an open space for collaboration among scientists across Europe (and beyond), this paper asks what the needs for supporting the implementation of PEDs are. To answer this, it draws on Delphi process (expert reviews) as the main method alongside the literature review and also uses surveys as supplementary methods to identify the main challenges for developing PEDs. Initial findings reveal seven interacting topics that later were ranked as highest to the lowest as the following: governance, incentive, social, process, market, technology and context. These are interrelated and interdependent, implying that none can be considered in isolation of the others and cannot be left out in order to ensure the successful development of PEDs. The resources that are needed to address these challenges are a common need for systematic understanding of the processes behind them, as well as cross-disciplinary models and protocols to manage the complexity of developing PEDs. The results can be the basis for devising the conceptual framework on the development of new PED guides and tools.
DOI	10.3390/su131910551
Cilt	13

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Positive energy districts: Identifying challenges and interdependencies

Yazar Krangsås, S. G., Steemers, K., Konstantinou, T., Soutullo, S., Liu, M., Giancola, E., Prebreza, B., Ashrafian Bonab, Touraj, Murauskaitė, L., Maas, N.

Basım Tarihi 2021-10

Basım Yeri - MDPI

Konu Challenges, Collaboration, Cost action, Governance, Market, Needs, Participation, Positive energy district, Tools

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 2071-1050

Kayıt Numarası 4eda53f5-1d63-4a0e-906f-0c6be31426cf

Lokasyon Architecture

Tarih 2021-10

Notlar European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Örnek Metin Positive Energy Districts (PED) are areas within cities that generate more renewable energy than they consume, contributing to cities’ energy system transformation toward carbon neutrality. Since PED is a novel concept, the implementation is very challenging. Within the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action, which offers an open space for collaboration among scientists across Europe (and beyond), this paper asks what the needs for supporting the implementation of PEDs are. To answer this, it draws on Delphi process (expert reviews) as the main method alongside the literature review and also uses surveys as supplementary methods to identify the main challenges for developing PEDs. Initial findings reveal seven interacting topics that later were ranked as highest to the lowest as the following: governance, incentive, social, process, market, technology and context. These are interrelated and interdependent, implying that none can be considered in isolation of the others and cannot be left out in order to ensure the successful development of PEDs. The resources that are needed to address these challenges are a common need for systematic understanding of the processes behind them, as well as cross-disciplinary models and protocols to manage the complexity of developing PEDs. The results can be the basis for devising the conceptual framework on the development of new PED guides and tools.

DOI 10.3390/su131910551

Cilt 13