Court case with the plaintiff, director of Chania Muslim foundations, represented by the director Ali Kasimzade and Lawyer Markadonaki, acting on behalf of the director, and the defendant, Haji Mehmed Noukali, represented by Lawyer Georgiou M. Foumi

İsim	Court case with the plaintiff, director of Chania Muslim foundations, represented by the director Ali Kasimzade and Lawyer Markadonaki, acting on behalf of the director, and the defendant, Haji Mehmed Noukali, represented by Lawyer Georgiou M. Foumi
Basım Tarihi:	1910-11-06
Tür	kitap
Dil	Modern Yunanca
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Fiziksel Boyutlar	20-30 cm
Kütüphane:	SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Demirbaş Numarası	ACCEVPR00388
Kayıt Numarası	52407
Lokasyon	SALT Research
Tarih	1910-11-06
Notlar	Previous to 1897, mouteveli was obliged to offer 1/4 of incomes of Vakif to the administration according to the new regulations of 1899, the Vakif estate became the private property of the Mouteveli, who payed to the administration a 1000 dr. compensation. The administration supports that according to the law he had to pay 2000 dr. and asks for the rest of the money appeal by the plaintiff against the first decision of the court accepted under the condition that he will take the oath.

Kaynağa git SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları

SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları

Court case with the plaintiff, director of Chania Muslim foundations, represented by the director Ali Kasimzade and Lawyer Markadonaki, acting on behalf of the director, and the defendant, Haji Mehmed Noukali, represented by Lawyer Georgiou M. Foumi

Basım Tarihi 1910-11-06

Tür kitap

Dil Modern Yunanca

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Fiziksel Boyutlar 20-30 cm

Kütüphane SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları

Demirbaş Numarası ACCEVPR00388

Kayıt Numarası 52407

Lokasyon SALT Research

Tarih 1910-11-06

Notlar Previous to 1897, mouteveli was obliged to offer 1/4 of incomes of Vakif to the administration according to the new regulations of 1899, the Vakif estate became the private property of the Mouteveli, who payed to the administration a 1000 dr. compensation. The administration supports that according to the law he had to pay 2000 dr. and asks for the rest of the money appeal by the plaintiff against the first decision of the court accepted under the condition that he will take the oath.