Public policy in the enforcement of forein arbitral awards in the light of the judgments of the court of cassation

عنوان Public policy in the enforcement of forein arbitral awards in the light of the judgments of the court of cassation
نویسنده Ekşi, Nuray
تاریخ انتشار: 2020
محل انتشار - Istanbul University
موضوع New York convention, Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, Public policy, The fundamental principles of law, Mandatory rules, Excessive compensation, Excessive cost of arbitration, Excessive interest or compound interest, Enforcement of arbitral award including punitive damages, The enforcement of anti-suit injunction order by arbitrators, Enforcement of the foreign arbitral awards contrary to the mandatory rules
نوع دوره ای
زبان انگلیسی
دیجیتال بله
نسخه خطی خیر
کتابخانه: دانشگاه اوزیغین
شناسه دارایی کتابخانه 2651-5377
شماره ثبت 6bd65c27-fad0-4eb8-bf36-dce89c35d449
محل کتابخانه Law
تاریخ 2020
متن نمونه In this study, first, the concepts of "recognition" and "enforcement" of foreign arbitral awards will be explained. Then, the legal basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be clarified. The principles proposed in the academic circles to prevent the use of public policy beyond its purpose in enforcement of foreign arbitral awards proceedings will be briefly explained. Following that, what is considered by the doctrine to be part of public policy will be addressed. Thereafter, the attempts made by the courts framing public policy as an impediment to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be addressed. In addition, the elements which, in Court of Cassation decisions, are considered to be public policy grounds that justify denial of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be evaluated under ten headings. In the last part of the study, the effect of public policy on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards containing peculiar features will be examined. Three topics will be discussed under this title: first, the effect of public policy on enforcement of interim measures granted by arbitrators; second, the effect of public policy on the enforcement of the RICO or punitive damages awards, and third, the effect of public policy on the recognition of the anti-suit injunctions ordered by arbitrators. Our general evaluation regarding public policy as a bar to enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in terms of Turkish doctrine and practice will be presented in the conclusion.
DOI 10.26650/ppil.2020.40.1.0023
Cilt 40
مشاهده در منبع دانشگاه اوزیغین Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Özyeğin Üniversitesi دانشگاه اوزیغین

Public policy in the enforcement of forein arbitral awards in the light of the judgments of the court of cassation

نویسنده Ekşi, Nuray
تاریخ انتشار 2020
محل انتشار - Istanbul University
موضوع New York convention, Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, Public policy, The fundamental principles of law, Mandatory rules, Excessive compensation, Excessive cost of arbitration, Excessive interest or compound interest, Enforcement of arbitral award including punitive damages, The enforcement of anti-suit injunction order by arbitrators, Enforcement of the foreign arbitral awards contrary to the mandatory rules
نوع دوره ای
زبان انگلیسی
دیجیتال بله
نسخه خطی خیر
کتابخانه دانشگاه اوزیغین
شناسه دارایی کتابخانه 2651-5377
شماره ثبت 6bd65c27-fad0-4eb8-bf36-dce89c35d449
محل کتابخانه Law
تاریخ 2020
متن نمونه In this study, first, the concepts of "recognition" and "enforcement" of foreign arbitral awards will be explained. Then, the legal basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be clarified. The principles proposed in the academic circles to prevent the use of public policy beyond its purpose in enforcement of foreign arbitral awards proceedings will be briefly explained. Following that, what is considered by the doctrine to be part of public policy will be addressed. Thereafter, the attempts made by the courts framing public policy as an impediment to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be addressed. In addition, the elements which, in Court of Cassation decisions, are considered to be public policy grounds that justify denial of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be evaluated under ten headings. In the last part of the study, the effect of public policy on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards containing peculiar features will be examined. Three topics will be discussed under this title: first, the effect of public policy on enforcement of interim measures granted by arbitrators; second, the effect of public policy on the enforcement of the RICO or punitive damages awards, and third, the effect of public policy on the recognition of the anti-suit injunctions ordered by arbitrators. Our general evaluation regarding public policy as a bar to enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in terms of Turkish doctrine and practice will be presented in the conclusion.
DOI 10.26650/ppil.2020.40.1.0023
Cilt 40
Özyeğin Üniversitesi
دانشگاه اوزیغین شما در حال هدایت مجدد هستید...

لطفاً صبر کنید