Back to Search

Unpacking the research process: a case and a sociology research

Title	Unpacking the research process: a case and a sociology research
Author	Gür, Faik
Publication Date:	2015
Publication Place	- Cyprus International University
Subject	Research process, Self-reflexivity, Rural sociology, Ethnography, Ethnography
Type	Periodical
Language	Turkish
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	No
Library:	Özyeğin University
Library Asset ID	1300-7491
Record ID	ada0cfa4-34d4-4d8a-b43b-c0ebb55a2d59
Library Location	International Relations
Date	2015
Sample Text	The research process is a process that can be addressed in a wide range, from philosophical problematization to "self-reflexivity" discussions and the act of memory creation, such as recording only the mechanical aspect of the process. Incorporating the process into the realm of knowledge production is also problematic. It would be wrong to say that it does not contain "dangers" for researchers. For example, when writing about field experience or testimony, you may reach a point where you can consider it as fiction or memoir. Giving importance to interdisciplinary studies may reduce the extreme points that may arise in this way, but there is always a high probability of not being able to achieve the level of questioning that the depth specific to a discipline will bring. Being able to master the sensitivities of each discipline, on the one hand, and being able to present the subject from a blind spot that not every discipline can see, on the other hand, means a formation that is not easy to achieve. One of the most effective ways to overcome this is undoubtedly the collaboration of researchers specialized in different disciplines. The research process is a process that can be addressed in a wide range, ranging from philosophical problematization to an account of self-reflexivity as well as an action to create a memory through the mechanical nature of registration. To include it in the process of knowledge production is a problematic issue in itself. Also such an effort may pose a “danger” for researchers. For instance, you may end up writing something that most readers would call a fiction and/or a memoir while writing field experience. Paying attention to interdisciplinary studies can be a solution in preventing it from happening. However, there is always a good chance to fail. On the one hand you have to know the sensitive issues of different disciplines well enough, on the other, you need to look at them from an angle that not every discipline takes. This is not an easy task to achieve, and that it requires a good deal of education and training to ascertain the quality of research. There is an easier way to handle this: scholars and researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds could work together and thus the questions they pose and issues they raise can have a chance to develop without falling into tourism.
Cilt	21

View in source Özyeğin University Özyeğin University - Ottoman library catalog search

Özyeğin University

Unpacking the research process: a case and a sociology research

Author Gür, Faik

Publication Date 2015

Publication Place - Cyprus International University

Subject Research process, Self-reflexivity, Rural sociology, Ethnography, Ethnography

Type Periodical

Language Turkish

Digital Yes

Manuscript No

Library Özyeğin University

Library Asset ID 1300-7491

Record ID ada0cfa4-34d4-4d8a-b43b-c0ebb55a2d59

Library Location International Relations

Date 2015

Sample Text The research process is a process that can be addressed in a wide range, from philosophical problematization to "self-reflexivity" discussions and the act of memory creation, such as recording only the mechanical aspect of the process. Incorporating the process into the realm of knowledge production is also problematic. It would be wrong to say that it does not contain "dangers" for researchers. For example, when writing about field experience or testimony, you may reach a point where you can consider it as fiction or memoir. Giving importance to interdisciplinary studies may reduce the extreme points that may arise in this way, but there is always a high probability of not being able to achieve the level of questioning that the depth specific to a discipline will bring. Being able to master the sensitivities of each discipline, on the one hand, and being able to present the subject from a blind spot that not every discipline can see, on the other hand, means a formation that is not easy to achieve. One of the most effective ways to overcome this is undoubtedly the collaboration of researchers specialized in different disciplines. The research process is a process that can be addressed in a wide range, ranging from philosophical problematization to an account of self-reflexivity as well as an action to create a memory through the mechanical nature of registration. To include it in the process of knowledge production is a problematic issue in itself. Also such an effort may pose a “danger” for researchers. For instance, you may end up writing something that most readers would call a fiction and/or a memoir while writing field experience. Paying attention to interdisciplinary studies can be a solution in preventing it from happening. However, there is always a good chance to fail. On the one hand you have to know the sensitive issues of different disciplines well enough, on the other, you need to look at them from an angle that not every discipline takes. This is not an easy task to achieve, and that it requires a good deal of education and training to ascertain the quality of research. There is an easier way to handle this: scholars and researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds could work together and thus the questions they pose and issues they raise can have a chance to develop without falling into tourism.

Cilt 21