Author
Yağcı, Alper H.
Publication Date
2019-06-03
Publication Place
-
Taylor & Francis
Subject
Advocacy coalitions, Collective action, Environmental politics, GMOs, Turkey, Public policy
Type
Periodical
Language
English
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Özyeğin University
Library Asset ID
1350-1763
Record ID
79e86269-1147-480b-ad8e-223c7e2ba458
Library Location
International Relations
Date
2019-06-03
Notes
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Sample Text
Turkey's biosafety regulations allow genetically modified food to be imported from abroad while prohibiting cultivation in Turkey - a puzzling regime that discriminates against domestic production. This article demonstrates that the making of the regime was the result of competition between two advocacy coalitions trying to recruit influential members and increase their leverage on the decision-making process. In the advocacy coalition framework, underlying the preferences of actors there are complex belief systems which are formed in a context of bounded rationality and significant information costs. This article highlights the importance of mechanisms of differential access to information: information is more readily available to corporate groups which can act in concert by solving collective action problems. Large groups with many small members are at a disadvantage in doing so due to collective action dynamics, and consequently they may adopt the position of rational ignorance rather than active engagement with the policy process.
DOI
10.1080/13501763.2018.1509884
Cilt
26