ADVISOR: An adjustable framework for test oracle automation of visual output systems

Title ADVISOR: An adjustable framework for test oracle automation of visual output systems
Author Genç, A. E., Sözer, Hasan, Kıraç, Mustafa Furkan, Aktemur, Tankut Barış
Publication Date: 2020-09
Publication Place - IEEE
Subject Adjustable framework, Black-box testing, Com-puter vision, Test automation, Test oracle
Type Periodical
Language English
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library: Özyeğin University
Library Asset ID 0018-9529
Record ID 5cd867db-4997-412b-ad75-4c6e19b8ab24
Library Location Computer Science
Date 2020-09
Sample Text Test oracles differentiate between the correct and incorrect system behavior. Automation of test oracles for visual output systems mainly involves image comparison, where a snapshot of the output is compared with respect to a reference image. Hereby, the captured snapshot can be subject to variations such as scaling and shifting. These variations lead to incorrect evaluations. Existing approaches employ computer vision techniques to address a specific set of variations. In this article, we introduce ADVISOR, an adjustable framework for test oracle automation of visual output systems. It allows the use of a flexible combination and configuration of computer vision techniques. We evaluated a set of valid configurations with a benchmark dataset collected during the tests of commercial digital TV systems. Some of these configurations achieved up to 3% better overall accuracy with respect to state-of-the-art tools. Further, we observed that there is no configuration that reaches the best accuracy for all types of image variations. We also empirically investigated the impact of significant parameters. One of them is a threshold regarding image matching score that determines the final verdict. This parameter is automatically tuned by offline training. We evaluated runtime performance as well. Results showed that differences among the ADVISOR configurations and state-of-the-art tools are in the order of seconds per image comparison.
DOI 10.1109/TR.2019.2957507
Cilt 69
View in source Özyeğin University Özyeğin University - Historical works, archives, and periodicals search engine
Özyeğin University - Historical works, archives, and periodicals search engine Özyeğin University

ADVISOR: An adjustable framework for test oracle automation of visual output systems

Author Genç, A. E., Sözer, Hasan, Kıraç, Mustafa Furkan, Aktemur, Tankut Barış
Publication Date 2020-09
Publication Place - IEEE
Subject Adjustable framework, Black-box testing, Com-puter vision, Test automation, Test oracle
Type Periodical
Language English
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library Özyeğin University
Library Asset ID 0018-9529
Record ID 5cd867db-4997-412b-ad75-4c6e19b8ab24
Library Location Computer Science
Date 2020-09
Sample Text Test oracles differentiate between the correct and incorrect system behavior. Automation of test oracles for visual output systems mainly involves image comparison, where a snapshot of the output is compared with respect to a reference image. Hereby, the captured snapshot can be subject to variations such as scaling and shifting. These variations lead to incorrect evaluations. Existing approaches employ computer vision techniques to address a specific set of variations. In this article, we introduce ADVISOR, an adjustable framework for test oracle automation of visual output systems. It allows the use of a flexible combination and configuration of computer vision techniques. We evaluated a set of valid configurations with a benchmark dataset collected during the tests of commercial digital TV systems. Some of these configurations achieved up to 3% better overall accuracy with respect to state-of-the-art tools. Further, we observed that there is no configuration that reaches the best accuracy for all types of image variations. We also empirically investigated the impact of significant parameters. One of them is a threshold regarding image matching score that determines the final verdict. This parameter is automatically tuned by offline training. We evaluated runtime performance as well. Results showed that differences among the ADVISOR configurations and state-of-the-art tools are in the order of seconds per image comparison.
DOI 10.1109/TR.2019.2957507
Cilt 69
Özyeğin University - Historical works, archives, and periodicals search engine
Özyeğin University You are being redirected...

Please wait