A footnote to the chosen statement in Sharh Ghayat al-Ikhtsar by Ibn Qasim al-Ghazi - Part 1 -
(حاشيه على القول المختار في شرح غايه الاختصار لابن قاسم الغزي ج )

Name: A footnote to the chosen statement in Sharh Ghayat al-Ikhtsar by Ibn Qasim al-Ghazi - Part 1 -
Author: Al-Bajuri, Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Ahmed

Title	A footnote to the chosen statement in Sharh Ghayat al-Ikhtsar by Ibn Qasim al-Ghazi - Part 1 -
Title Original	حاشيه على القول المختار في شرح غايه الاختصار لابن قاسم الغزي ج
Author	Al-Bajuri, Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Ahmed
Author Original	الباجوري ، إبراهيم بن محمد بن أحمد
Publication Place	- Al-Bajuri, Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Ahmed
Subject	Shafi'i jurisprudence
Type	Book
Language	Arabic
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	Yes
Physical Dimensions	517 ورقة 25 سطر ، المقاس الداخلي : 23x16 سم
Library:	King Fahd National Laibrary
Record ID	17c55f2b-95ce-67e8-19dd-eb7897772016
Library Location	King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies
Notes	Its land and moisture 24.7 x 18.2 cm. The beginning of the manuscript: Praise be to God who guided us to His right path and guided us to His upright religion.. As for what follows, the poor servant says to his Almighty Lord.. He has greatly benefited and benefited from Ibn Qasim al-Ghazi’s commentary on Abu Shuja’, as well as his commentary by the scholar al-Baramawi.. Copied by: Mustafa bin Muhammad al-Assal al-Shafi’i End of the manuscript: His saying, and the most correct thing is that the authorization By acknowledgment, it is not valid, as the author’s statement except with his permission is weak, so if he said to someone else, “I appointed you.. and it is not based on the more correct thing if he said, “I appointed you,” to acknowledge to so-and-so, to acknowledge to so-and-so a thousand that he owes to me, because he did not mention it on my behalf while mentioning it on me, and God knows best what is correct, and to Him is the reference and the return.. The last part ends (Chapter on the rulings on agency). I wrote the chapter titles and the word “saying” in red ink. Corrected version. The copyist differed between his proof of the date of copying in letters and numbers, so he wrote in letters: one thousand two hundred and ninety-nine, and wrote in numbers: 1279, and the correct thing in numbers is because he wrote the second part that follows in the year 1280.
Yazı Tipi	نسخ

View in source King Fahd National Laibrary King Fahd National Laibrary - Ottoman library catalog search

King Fahd National Laibrary

A footnote to the chosen statement in Sharh Ghayat al-Ikhtsar by Ibn Qasim al-Ghazi - Part 1 -

(حاشيه على القول المختار في شرح غايه الاختصار لابن قاسم الغزي ج )

Author Al-Bajuri, Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Ahmed

Author Original الباجوري ، إبراهيم بن محمد بن أحمد

Publication Place - Al-Bajuri, Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Ahmed

Subject Shafi'i jurisprudence

Type Book

Language Arabic

Digital Yes

Manuscript Yes

Physical Dimensions 517 ورقة 25 سطر ، المقاس الداخلي : 23x16 سم

Library King Fahd National Laibrary

Record ID 17c55f2b-95ce-67e8-19dd-eb7897772016

Library Location King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies

Notes Its land and moisture 24.7 x 18.2 cm. The beginning of the manuscript: Praise be to God who guided us to His right path and guided us to His upright religion.. As for what follows, the poor servant says to his Almighty Lord.. He has greatly benefited and benefited from Ibn Qasim al-Ghazi’s commentary on Abu Shuja’, as well as his commentary by the scholar al-Baramawi.. Copied by: Mustafa bin Muhammad al-Assal al-Shafi’i End of the manuscript: His saying, and the most correct thing is that the authorization By acknowledgment, it is not valid, as the author’s statement except with his permission is weak, so if he said to someone else, “I appointed you.. and it is not based on the more correct thing if he said, “I appointed you,” to acknowledge to so-and-so, to acknowledge to so-and-so a thousand that he owes to me, because he did not mention it on my behalf while mentioning it on me, and God knows best what is correct, and to Him is the reference and the return.. The last part ends (Chapter on the rulings on agency). I wrote the chapter titles and the word “saying” in red ink. Corrected version. The copyist differed between his proof of the date of copying in letters and numbers, so he wrote in letters: one thousand two hundred and ninety-nine, and wrote in numbers: 1279, and the correct thing in numbers is because he wrote the second part that follows in the year 1280.

Yazı Tipi نسخ