Mir's footnote on the subject of ratifications
(حاشيه مير على مبحث التصديقات)

Name: Mir's footnote on the subject of ratifications
Author: Mir Zahid, Muhammad Mir Zahid bin Muhammad Aslam Al-Harawi

Title	Mir's footnote on the subject of ratifications
Title Original	حاشيه مير على مبحث التصديقات
Author	Mir Zahid, Muhammad Mir Zahid bin Muhammad Aslam Al-Harawi
Author Original	مير زاهد ، محمد مير زاهد بن محمد أسلم الهروي
Publication Place	- Mir Zahid, Muhammad Mir Zahid bin Muhammad Aslam Al-Harawi
Subject	logic
Type	kitap
Language	Arabic
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	Yes
Physical Dimensions	72و - ورقة 12 سطر ، المقاس الداخلي : 21,7x14,6 سم
Library:	King Fahd National Laibrary
Record ID	e0ad807a-d2dd-d394-5a23-7cd19280884a
Library Location	King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies
Notes	21.7 x 14.6 cm. The beginning of the manuscript: The commentator said: The second article is about propositions and their rulings...etc., that is, the topics related to predicates and conditionals and their rulings, and adding rulings to the pronoun of propositions, such as adding the general to the specific, and what is meant by the propositions is not their concept, but rather their specific individuals, and the concept of the opposite is more important than them before the addition... Within this group is the fourth letter of it. Minus the first and last. No title or author's name was mentioned. The paragraph heads were written in red ink. Warning lines are marked in red ink. At the beginning of the total, he stopped in the name of Hussein bin Abdullah, known as Ibn Damad Saber Zadeh. The end of the manuscript: The approximation is made because what is meant by the concept of the antecedent in the continuous is the obligatory, and the concept of the subsequent is the necessary, and the obligatory is not actually necessary, and it is evident by force, since it is not necessary for the obligatory to be necessary and the necessary is obligatory, and the concept of the prior in the continuous is the recalcitrant by the kasra, and the concept of the recalcitrant by the fatḥa, and it is not distinct that the continuous is into two parts without the disjunctive, his saying.
Yazı Tipi	نستعليق

View in source King Fahd National Laibrary King Fahd National Laibrary - Ottoman library catalog search

King Fahd National Laibrary

Mir's footnote on the subject of ratifications

(حاشيه مير على مبحث التصديقات)

Author Mir Zahid, Muhammad Mir Zahid bin Muhammad Aslam Al-Harawi

Author Original مير زاهد ، محمد مير زاهد بن محمد أسلم الهروي

Publication Place - Mir Zahid, Muhammad Mir Zahid bin Muhammad Aslam Al-Harawi

Subject logic

Type kitap

Language Arabic

Digital Yes

Manuscript Yes

Physical Dimensions 72و - ورقة 12 سطر ، المقاس الداخلي : 21,7x14,6 سم

Library King Fahd National Laibrary

Record ID e0ad807a-d2dd-d394-5a23-7cd19280884a

Library Location King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies

Notes 21.7 x 14.6 cm. The beginning of the manuscript: The commentator said: The second article is about propositions and their rulings...etc., that is, the topics related to predicates and conditionals and their rulings, and adding rulings to the pronoun of propositions, such as adding the general to the specific, and what is meant by the propositions is not their concept, but rather their specific individuals, and the concept of the opposite is more important than them before the addition... Within this group is the fourth letter of it. Minus the first and last. No title or author's name was mentioned. The paragraph heads were written in red ink. Warning lines are marked in red ink. At the beginning of the total, he stopped in the name of Hussein bin Abdullah, known as Ibn Damad Saber Zadeh. The end of the manuscript: The approximation is made because what is meant by the concept of the antecedent in the continuous is the obligatory, and the concept of the subsequent is the necessary, and the obligatory is not actually necessary, and it is evident by force, since it is not necessary for the obligatory to be necessary and the necessary is obligatory, and the concept of the prior in the continuous is the recalcitrant by the kasra, and the concept of the recalcitrant by the fatḥa, and it is not distinct that the continuous is into two parts without the disjunctive, his saying.

Yazı Tipi نستعليق