Author
Mollaibrahimoğlu, Süleyman, Harbi, Abdurrahman, Şimşek, Ahmet
Publication Place
Mardin Artuklu University Publications -
Mardin Artuklu University Publications
Subject
Artuklu Akademi, 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.89-114
Type
Book
Language
ara,tur
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Leitir Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 2148-3264, EISSN: 2148-3264, EISSN: 2687-427X, DOI: 10.34247/artukluakademi.551345
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_df50130ce2cc478a9f84951c9dc811bd
Library Location
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Notes
One of the most important of the Ulûmü'l-Kur'an, which was created for the preservation, interpretation and interpretation of the Holy Quran, is naskh. Abrogation, which has been the subject of many academic studies and taken into consideration by almost every commentator, is also one of the common ancient issues of Islamic sciences. In this article, an attempt has been made to compare the ways in which Mâtürîdî (d. 333/944)'s Te'vîlâtü'l-Kur'ân and Zamahşerî's (d. 538/1144) Keşşâf deal with the issue of abrogation. As a result of the study, it was seen that the subject of abrogation was given sufficient space in both works and that the issue was discussed and examined in general aspects. Both commentators, on the one hand, took into account the traditional scientific heritage on the subject, and on the other hand, revealed their acumen on the subject. Although they have a generally close stance on abrogation, it has been observed that the two commentators have a different and internally integrated perspective on evaluating the narrations and especially on the sources that form the basis for abrogation.
Detaylı Başlık
Te’vîlâtü’l-Kur’ân ile Keşşâf tefsirlerinin nesh açısından mukayesesi
