Author
Abbas Panahi
Subject
Historiography
Type
Book
Language
Persian
Digital
Yes
Manuscript
No
Library
Royal Danish Library
Library Asset ID
ISSN: 2008-8841, EISSN: 2538-3507, DOI: 10.22051/hph.2020.28981.1404
Record ID
cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0aaec71a34f47e08693aaf18485de57
Library Location
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notes
According to methods and standpoints, most accounts written by Jangali worriers or eyewitnesses to this movement are categorized as those supporting or rejecting the movement. Yeghikian, however, gives a narrative, both accurate and informed, of the movement from a bird’s eye view. He emphasizes the Soviet Union of Guilan and chronicles the movement. He employing a scientific method that is both rigorous and disinterested. However, there are overt signs of tilting towards the British and criticizing the Ottomans and Axis powers in his book. The research question is: What is Yeghikian’s approach to the historical development of the movement from the perspective of historiographical method and standpoint? The findings indicate that the account he provides is more documented than those presented by other historians. This stems from his association with a diverse range of warriors involved in the movement and having access to confidential documents. The desk method is employed in the study. The analytical-critical approach in historiography is applied to The Soviet Union and Jangal (Jungle) Movement and other works by Yeghikian revolving around this topic.
Görüntüle
تاریخ نگری و تاریخ نگاری, 2019-12, Vol.29 (24), p.43-64