French diplomacy towards the Egyptian issue from the beginning of the crisis until the Treaty of Hunkar-Eskle, 1831-1833 AD: A study in light of unpublished British Foreign Office documents.

Name: French diplomacy towards the Egyptian issue from the beginning of the crisis until the Treaty of Hunkar-Eskle, 1831-1833 AD: A study in light of unpublished British Foreign Office documents.
Author: Omar, Youssef Hussein Youssef

Title	French diplomacy towards the Egyptian issue from the beginning of the crisis until the Treaty of Hunkar-Eskle, 1831-1833 AD: A study in light of unpublished British Foreign Office documents.
Author	Omar, Youssef Hussein Youssef
Type	Book
Language	Arabic
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	No
Library:	Royal Danish Library
Library Asset ID	ISSN: 1996-9546
Record ID	cdi_almandumah_primary_868357
Library Location	EBSCOhost Academic Search Complete
Notes	The study touched on an introduction to the development of French-Ottoman relations since 1536 AD, and the Egyptian issue was historically rooted, which began in 1831 AD when Muhammad Ali’s forces began to occupy the Levant and defeat the Ottoman Empire more than once, which led to the crystallization of French diplomacy towards the Egyptian issue, especially after the Ottoman Empire requested Russia’s help against Muhammad Ali, which sent its fleets and military forces to the Bosphorus Strait, which angered France, which was It has great interests in the Ottoman Empire, especially in the Levant, which made it coordinate with Britain against Russia. The study also touched on France’s position on the signing of the Peace of Kutahya on April 8, 1833 AD between the Ottoman Empire and Muhammad Ali Pasha, the Hunkar Iskele C Treaty on July 8, 1833 AD between Russia and the Ottoman Empire, and the Mochengratz Treaty of September 18, 1833 AD between Russia and Austria, which prompted France to threaten several times to have its fleet enter the Dardanelles Strait in order to protect its interests in the Ottoman Empire. This position continued until the end of the first phase of the conflict between the Ottoman Empire and Muhammad Ali in 1834 AD.
Görüntüle	Jordan Journal for History and Archaeology, 2017, Vol.11 (2), p.45-70

View in source Royal Danish Library Royal Danish Library - Ottoman library catalog search

Royal Danish Library

French diplomacy towards the Egyptian issue from the beginning of the crisis until the Treaty of Hunkar-Eskle, 1831-1833 AD: A study in light of unpublished British Foreign Office documents.

Author Omar, Youssef Hussein Youssef

Type Book

Language Arabic

Digital Yes

Manuscript No

Library Royal Danish Library

Library Asset ID ISSN: 1996-9546

Record ID cdi_almandumah_primary_868357

Library Location EBSCOhost Academic Search Complete

Notes The study touched on an introduction to the development of French-Ottoman relations since 1536 AD, and the Egyptian issue was historically rooted, which began in 1831 AD when Muhammad Ali’s forces began to occupy the Levant and defeat the Ottoman Empire more than once, which led to the crystallization of French diplomacy towards the Egyptian issue, especially after the Ottoman Empire requested Russia’s help against Muhammad Ali, which sent its fleets and military forces to the Bosphorus Strait, which angered France, which was It has great interests in the Ottoman Empire, especially in the Levant, which made it coordinate with Britain against Russia. The study also touched on France’s position on the signing of the Peace of Kutahya on April 8, 1833 AD between the Ottoman Empire and Muhammad Ali Pasha, the Hunkar Iskele C Treaty on July 8, 1833 AD between Russia and the Ottoman Empire, and the Mochengratz Treaty of September 18, 1833 AD between Russia and Austria, which prompted France to threaten several times to have its fleet enter the Dardanelles Strait in order to protect its interests in the Ottoman Empire. This position continued until the end of the first phase of the conflict between the Ottoman Empire and Muhammad Ali in 1834 AD.

Görüntüle Jordan Journal for History and Archaeology, 2017, Vol.11 (2), p.45-70