Comments on Qasas al-Mizan’s explanation by Samarkandi
(تعليقات على شرح قسطاس الميزان للسمرقندي)

Name: Comments on Qasas al-Mizan’s explanation by Samarkandi
Author: Not identified

Title	Comments on Qasas al-Mizan’s explanation by Samarkandi
Title Original	تعليقات على شرح قسطاس الميزان للسمرقندي
Author	Not identified
Publication Date:	unavailable
Publication Place	Istanbul - Turkey - Arshad al-Din al-Sarani
Subject	Logic.
Type	kitap
Language	Arabic
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	Yes
Pages Count	3
Physical Dimensions	16cm × 12cm
Library:	Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation
Library Asset ID	4862
Record ID	CC 51979
Library Location	Ayasofia - Türkiye (Istanbul) - Hagia Sophia Library - Hagia Sophia
Date	unavailable
Notes	At the end are two blank sheets of paper.
Sample Text	These are discussions on Al-Qastas’ explanation of Al-Samarqandi. He said: They are required that the perception of both sides of the case is not a perception. I say: This is only necessary if the two parties’ perception without the ruling is not a perception, or their perception with the ruling is not confirmation of their interpretation, and both of them are forbidden. Because the perception of both parties, if it does not necessitate the ruling, is permissible
Cilt	سختيان بزخرفة مركزية، وله لسان مقطوع
CDc	17047
Durum	رديء؛ يحتاج إلى الترميم.
Mürekkep rengi	أسود
Satır sayısı	25
Yazı türü	Naskh

View in source Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation

Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation

Comments on Qasas al-Mizan’s explanation by Samarkandi

(تعليقات على شرح قسطاس الميزان للسمرقندي)

Author Not identified

Publication Date unavailable

Publication Place Istanbul - Turkey - Arshad al-Din al-Sarani

Subject Logic.

Type kitap

Language Arabic

Digital Yes

Manuscript Yes

Pages Count 3

Physical Dimensions 16cm × 12cm

Library Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation

Library Asset ID 4862

Record ID CC 51979

Library Location Ayasofia - Türkiye (Istanbul) - Hagia Sophia Library - Hagia Sophia

Date unavailable

Notes At the end are two blank sheets of paper.

Sample Text These are discussions on Al-Qastas’ explanation of Al-Samarqandi. He said: They are required that the perception of both sides of the case is not a perception. I say: This is only necessary if the two parties’ perception without the ruling is not a perception, or their perception with the ruling is not confirmation of their interpretation, and both of them are forbidden. Because the perception of both parties, if it does not necessitate the ruling, is permissible

Cilt سختيان بزخرفة مركزية، وله لسان مقطوع

CDc 17047

Durum رديء؛ يحتاج إلى الترميم.

Mürekkep rengi أسود

Satır sayısı 25

Yazı türü Naskh