Back to Search

Restriction - shops, lawsuits, rent

Title	Restriction - shops, lawsuits, rent
Publication Date:	26/01/1913 — 17/02/1331
Subject	Stores, lawsuits, rent
Type	belge
Language	Arabic
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	No
Library:	King Abdul-Aziz Al Saoud Foundation for Islamic Studies and Human Sciences
Record ID	display10310
Date	26/01/1913 — 17/02/1331
Notes	Praise be to God, the eminent student, Mr. Muhammad, the jurist, the late Mr. Mahdi Al-Bar, on the honorable man, Mr. Muhammad bin Sidi Rashid Al-Taher, and Mr. Ahmed bin Al-Taher Al-Dasouli, claimed that the aforementioned plaintiff had forbidden all the decorations, customs, and keys of the shop located in the upper heater street, adjacent to the shop of Al-Qabbaj and the shop of Bin Shaqroun, for a period of four years for the defendant’s family. Then he testified on the back of the knot in his hand that he was a representative of it, and the eyes of the second defendant, Al-Dassouli, that he was a bull at the end of Muharram. The one who missed the connection got down from it and turned the rest of the knot over to the third party when he had testimonies under his hand. However, the plaintiff asked the second defendant to explain to him the reason for turning the knot over to the third party, and this is one of the stipulated conditions in the knot and the Akriyah and abandonment and Arafat on the seventeenth of Safar al-Khair in the year one thousand three hundred and thirty-one. Praise be to God, the two plaintiffs above admitted that the Supreme Law ruled against the plaintiff in the report of his lawsuit and the honorable Sidi Al-Tahir and with him are responsible for the above article. With the approval of his assistant, Ibn Ashun Arafa, the most capable of him, he testified to them in full and knew them at the time of his above date. Praise be to God, the Sharif, Sidi Muhammad Al-Taher, came and asked the plaintiff to show him the pots and his pocket for renting the shop in the month. Did they take over and overturn its knots? Was he arrested from those who had the rent for the previous month of Muharram? Was he aware of the begging that it was intended for the one who paid it for it? And when he got off of it, it remained in the hands of the owner of the money that is in it now, in complete demand, and considering the dearest law. He knew his destiny, which he attested to in full, and he recognized it in the history above. Praise be to God. The two plaintiffs above admitted that the most honorable law ruled that the plaintiff should state the above request, and the aforementioned honorable must answer from the article after that, with the approval of his assistant, Sidi Abd al-Rahman, who recognized his destiny, which he attested to them in full.

View in source King Abdul-Aziz Al Saoud Foundation for Islamic Studies and Human Sciences

King Abdul-Aziz Al Saoud Foundation for Islamic Studies and Human Sciences

Restriction - shops, lawsuits, rent

Publication Date 26/01/1913 — 17/02/1331

Subject Stores, lawsuits, rent

Type belge

Language Arabic

Digital Yes

Manuscript No

Library King Abdul-Aziz Al Saoud Foundation for Islamic Studies and Human Sciences

Record ID display10310

Date 26/01/1913 — 17/02/1331

Notes Praise be to God, the eminent student, Mr. Muhammad, the jurist, the late Mr. Mahdi Al-Bar, on the honorable man, Mr. Muhammad bin Sidi Rashid Al-Taher, and Mr. Ahmed bin Al-Taher Al-Dasouli, claimed that the aforementioned plaintiff had forbidden all the decorations, customs, and keys of the shop located in the upper heater street, adjacent to the shop of Al-Qabbaj and the shop of Bin Shaqroun, for a period of four years for the defendant’s family. Then he testified on the back of the knot in his hand that he was a representative of it, and the eyes of the second defendant, Al-Dassouli, that he was a bull at the end of Muharram. The one who missed the connection got down from it and turned the rest of the knot over to the third party when he had testimonies under his hand. However, the plaintiff asked the second defendant to explain to him the reason for turning the knot over to the third party, and this is one of the stipulated conditions in the knot and the Akriyah and abandonment and Arafat on the seventeenth of Safar al-Khair in the year one thousand three hundred and thirty-one. Praise be to God, the two plaintiffs above admitted that the Supreme Law ruled against the plaintiff in the report of his lawsuit and the honorable Sidi Al-Tahir and with him are responsible for the above article. With the approval of his assistant, Ibn Ashun Arafa, the most capable of him, he testified to them in full and knew them at the time of his above date. Praise be to God, the Sharif, Sidi Muhammad Al-Taher, came and asked the plaintiff to show him the pots and his pocket for renting the shop in the month. Did they take over and overturn its knots? Was he arrested from those who had the rent for the previous month of Muharram? Was he aware of the begging that it was intended for the one who paid it for it? And when he got off of it, it remained in the hands of the owner of the money that is in it now, in complete demand, and considering the dearest law. He knew his destiny, which he attested to in full, and he recognized it in the history above. Praise be to God. The two plaintiffs above admitted that the most honorable law ruled that the plaintiff should state the above request, and the aforementioned honorable must answer from the article after that, with the approval of his assistant, Sidi Abd al-Rahman, who recognized his destiny, which he attested to them in full.