Social Security Institution's sanction authority against private hospitals and its consequences in practice

Title Social Security Institution's sanction authority against private hospitals and its consequences in practice
Author Par, Selahattin
Publication Date: 2024
Subject Law, Turkey., Social security, Law and legislation, Turkey, Labor laws and legislation, Social legislation, Hospitals, Proprietary, Medical laws and legislation
Type Document
Language Turkish
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library: Özyeğin University
Record ID 55ab9096-da5d-4f84-a853-ed0139c2acb2
Library Location Department of Private Law
Date 2024
Sample Text Within the scope of this study, the sanctions and consequences of the Social Security Institution towards private hospitals were examined. These sanctions; The deduction arising from the private health provider's progress has been examined as a warning penalty, administrative fine, activity suspension penalty and contract termination/license withdrawal. Problems arise in terms of the sanction powers of the Social Security Institution and administrative sanctions, especially in deductions arising from entitlement. When the Supreme Court decisions are examined in terms of administrative sanctions, the main reason for outages or service disruptions is that those who are not urgent patients are shown as 'emergency patient admission'. However, the defendant parties' applications to the judicial authority regarding the cancellation of the administrative sanction; It requires the supervision of the Social Security Institution's transactions such as administrative fines, deductions and warning penalties. In addition, legal sanctions focused on "administrative measures" aimed at eliminating problems that prevent the provision of health services should also be considered as "administrative penalties". This is important in the context of showing that hospitals can comply with the rules more and laws can be a deterrent. Suggestions have been developed on the subject expressed in this study; It has been determined that they can make administrative-judicial requests within the context of the legal functions of administrative sanctions and that the deductions related to penalties are refunded if they are unfair transactions. Places such as the Social Security Institution need to be able to take administrative penalty action responsibilities arising from penalties arising from unnecessary transactions, and it has been determined that this may be important in the judicial authority., Within the scope of this study, the sanction and consequences of the Social Security Institution for private hospitals were examined. These sanctions; The deduction arising from the progress of the private health provider was examined as a warning penalty, administrative fine, stopping penalty and contract termination/recovery of the license. The Social Security Institution is experienced in terms of sanction powers and administrative sanctions, especially in the deductions arising from the entitlement. When the decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals are examined in terms of administrative sanctions, the main reason for interruptions or service disruptions is that non-emergency patients are shown as 'Emergency Patient Introduction'. However, the judicial authority applications of the parties defendant regarding the cancellation of administrative sanctions; The Social Security Institution requires supervision of the transactions such as administrative money, deduction and warning penalties. In addition, the "administrative measure" focused legal sanctions aimed at eliminating the problems that prevent health care services should be "administrative punishment". This is important in the context of showing that hospitals can comply with the rules and laws may be deterrent. Suggestions were developed on the subject expressed in this study; In the context of the legal functions of administrative sanctions, they could make administrative-aggressive requests and that the deductions regarding the penalties were returned in the case of unfair proceedings. Places such as the Social Security Institution should be able to obtain administrative penalty responsibilities due to unnecessary procedures and it is determined that this may be important in the judicial authority.
View in source Özyeğin University Özyeğin University - Ottoman library catalog search
Özyeğin University - Ottoman library catalog search Özyeğin University

Social Security Institution's sanction authority against private hospitals and its consequences in practice

Author Par, Selahattin
Publication Date 2024
Subject Law, Turkey., Social security, Law and legislation, Turkey, Labor laws and legislation, Social legislation, Hospitals, Proprietary, Medical laws and legislation
Type Document
Language Turkish
Digital Yes
Manuscript No
Library Özyeğin University
Record ID 55ab9096-da5d-4f84-a853-ed0139c2acb2
Library Location Department of Private Law
Date 2024
Sample Text Within the scope of this study, the sanctions and consequences of the Social Security Institution towards private hospitals were examined. These sanctions; The deduction arising from the private health provider's progress has been examined as a warning penalty, administrative fine, activity suspension penalty and contract termination/license withdrawal. Problems arise in terms of the sanction powers of the Social Security Institution and administrative sanctions, especially in deductions arising from entitlement. When the Supreme Court decisions are examined in terms of administrative sanctions, the main reason for outages or service disruptions is that those who are not urgent patients are shown as 'emergency patient admission'. However, the defendant parties' applications to the judicial authority regarding the cancellation of the administrative sanction; It requires the supervision of the Social Security Institution's transactions such as administrative fines, deductions and warning penalties. In addition, legal sanctions focused on "administrative measures" aimed at eliminating problems that prevent the provision of health services should also be considered as "administrative penalties". This is important in the context of showing that hospitals can comply with the rules more and laws can be a deterrent. Suggestions have been developed on the subject expressed in this study; It has been determined that they can make administrative-judicial requests within the context of the legal functions of administrative sanctions and that the deductions related to penalties are refunded if they are unfair transactions. Places such as the Social Security Institution need to be able to take administrative penalty action responsibilities arising from penalties arising from unnecessary transactions, and it has been determined that this may be important in the judicial authority., Within the scope of this study, the sanction and consequences of the Social Security Institution for private hospitals were examined. These sanctions; The deduction arising from the progress of the private health provider was examined as a warning penalty, administrative fine, stopping penalty and contract termination/recovery of the license. The Social Security Institution is experienced in terms of sanction powers and administrative sanctions, especially in the deductions arising from the entitlement. When the decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals are examined in terms of administrative sanctions, the main reason for interruptions or service disruptions is that non-emergency patients are shown as 'Emergency Patient Introduction'. However, the judicial authority applications of the parties defendant regarding the cancellation of administrative sanctions; The Social Security Institution requires supervision of the transactions such as administrative money, deduction and warning penalties. In addition, the "administrative measure" focused legal sanctions aimed at eliminating the problems that prevent health care services should be "administrative punishment". This is important in the context of showing that hospitals can comply with the rules and laws may be deterrent. Suggestions were developed on the subject expressed in this study; In the context of the legal functions of administrative sanctions, they could make administrative-aggressive requests and that the deductions regarding the penalties were returned in the case of unfair proceedings. Places such as the Social Security Institution should be able to obtain administrative penalty responsibilities due to unnecessary procedures and it is determined that this may be important in the judicial authority.
Özyeğin University - Ottoman library catalog search
Özyeğin University You are being redirected...

Please wait