Back to Search

Inheritor's collusion in terms of immovable properties

Title	Inheritor's collusion in terms of immovable properties
Author	İlaldı, Helin Rojda
Publication Date:	2021-09
Type	Document
Language	Turkish
Digital	Yes
Manuscript	No
Library:	Özyeğin University
Record ID	9277cc89-ec17-41a0-9df7-733e0f20aaad
Library Location	Department of Private Law
Date	2021-09
Sample Text	The subject of this study is the collusive transactions in registered immovable properties carried out by the testator in order to smuggle goods from his heirs. Collusion can be defined as the state of knowingly creating inconsistency between the will and statements of the parties to a contract. In the Muris muvaza, the testator actually presents the real estate he donated as an agreement to sell or care for it until his death. In the first part of our thesis, which we will deal with in this context, the general concepts of muris pretend and the facts that cause this type of pretend, as well as the relations of this type of pretend with similar concepts will be touched upon. In the second part, the elements of muris collusion and the dispositions that cannot be described as muris collusion in line with the decisions of the Supreme Court will be discussed. In the third chapter, the procedure and results of the collusion case in terms of immovable properties will be explained., The subject matter of this thesis is the fictitious transactions in the title deeds carried out by the inheritance in order to smuggle property from the heirs. Fictitious transactions can be defined as a state of deliberate inconsistency between the will and declarations of the parties to a contract. In the fictitious transactions, the inheritance shows the real estate he donated as a contract of selling or contract of keeping until die. In the first part of our thesis, which we will deal with in this context, the general concepts of fictitious transactions and the phenomena that cause this type of collision, as well as the relations of this type of collision with similar concepts will be assessed. In the second part, the elements of the fictitious transactions and the savings that cannot be described as the fictitious transactions in line with the Supreme Court decisions will be discussed. In the third part, the procedures and results of the fictitious transactions case will be explained in terms of immovables.

View in source Özyeğin University Özyeğin University - Ottoman library catalog search

Özyeğin University

Inheritor's collusion in terms of immovable properties

Author İlaldı, Helin Rojda

Publication Date 2021-09

Type Document

Language Turkish

Digital Yes

Manuscript No

Library Özyeğin University

Record ID 9277cc89-ec17-41a0-9df7-733e0f20aaad

Library Location Department of Private Law

Date 2021-09

Sample Text The subject of this study is the collusive transactions in registered immovable properties carried out by the testator in order to smuggle goods from his heirs. Collusion can be defined as the state of knowingly creating inconsistency between the will and statements of the parties to a contract. In the Muris muvaza, the testator actually presents the real estate he donated as an agreement to sell or care for it until his death. In the first part of our thesis, which we will deal with in this context, the general concepts of muris pretend and the facts that cause this type of pretend, as well as the relations of this type of pretend with similar concepts will be touched upon. In the second part, the elements of muris collusion and the dispositions that cannot be described as muris collusion in line with the decisions of the Supreme Court will be discussed. In the third chapter, the procedure and results of the collusion case in terms of immovable properties will be explained., The subject matter of this thesis is the fictitious transactions in the title deeds carried out by the inheritance in order to smuggle property from the heirs. Fictitious transactions can be defined as a state of deliberate inconsistency between the will and declarations of the parties to a contract. In the fictitious transactions, the inheritance shows the real estate he donated as a contract of selling or contract of keeping until die. In the first part of our thesis, which we will deal with in this context, the general concepts of fictitious transactions and the phenomena that cause this type of collision, as well as the relations of this type of collision with similar concepts will be assessed. In the second part, the elements of the fictitious transactions and the savings that cannot be described as the fictitious transactions in line with the Supreme Court decisions will be discussed. In the third part, the procedures and results of the fictitious transactions case will be explained in terms of immovables.