Habermas and Foucault: deliberative democracy and governmentality | Kütüphane.osmanlica.com

Habermas and Foucault: deliberative democracy and governmentality

İsim Habermas and Foucault: deliberative democracy and governmentality
Yazar Demir, Gökhan
Konu Business, Civil society, Deliberative democracy, Democracy, Social sciences
Tür Süreli Yayın
Dil Arapça
Dijital Hayır
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane: Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Demirbaş Numarası ISSN: 1309-8012, EISSN: 1309-8012
Kayıt Numarası cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1355849515
Notlar The aim of this paper is to trace the widespread conceptualisation of democracy and civil society through the works of Jürgen Habermas. In the vocabulary of contemporary social theory absolute correspondence and perfect harmony between civil society and democracy is taken for granted. In this conceptualisation, civil society is considered as a sphere and/ or a relational process in which democracy will be burgeoned. Diametrically opposite to the Habermasian understanding of democracy, Michel Foucault argues that civil society is not a terrain that is exempt from power relations. Instead civil society is at the core of various power struggles and as such it is a dynamic and internally contradictory space. In other words, Foucault problematizes the ground (democracy and civil society) which Habermas idealizes.
Bir Parçası Olduğu Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi, 1901-01, Vol.11 (22), p.48-71
Purdue University Libraries Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Kaynağa git

Habermas and Foucault: deliberative democracy and governmentality

Yazar Demir, Gökhan
Konu Business, Civil society, Deliberative democracy, Democracy, Social sciences
Tür Süreli Yayın
Dil Arapça
Dijital Hayır
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Demirbaş Numarası ISSN: 1309-8012, EISSN: 1309-8012
Kayıt Numarası cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1355849515
Notlar The aim of this paper is to trace the widespread conceptualisation of democracy and civil society through the works of Jürgen Habermas. In the vocabulary of contemporary social theory absolute correspondence and perfect harmony between civil society and democracy is taken for granted. In this conceptualisation, civil society is considered as a sphere and/ or a relational process in which democracy will be burgeoned. Diametrically opposite to the Habermasian understanding of democracy, Michel Foucault argues that civil society is not a terrain that is exempt from power relations. Instead civil society is at the core of various power struggles and as such it is a dynamic and internally contradictory space. In other words, Foucault problematizes the ground (democracy and civil society) which Habermas idealizes.
Bir Parçası Olduğu Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi, 1901-01, Vol.11 (22), p.48-71
Purdue University Libraries
Purdue Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri yönlendiriliyorsunuz...

Lütfen bekleyiniz.