Effect of different surface treatments on retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns

Name: Effect of different surface treatments on retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns
Author: Ozyetim, E. B., Özdemir, Zeynep, Başım, Gül Bahar, Bayraktar, G.

İsim	Effect of different surface treatments on retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns
Yazar	Ozyetim, E. B., Özdemir, Zeynep, Başım, Gül Bahar, Bayraktar, G.
Basım Tarihi:	2023
Basım Yeri	- Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	0893-2174
Kayıt Numarası	23117063-374a-4c33-ba84-0e41529866fe
Lokasyon	Mechanical Engineering
Tarih	2023
Örnek Metin	To evaluate the effect of different treatments applied to titanium implant abutment surfaces on the retention of implant-supported crowns retained using resin cement. Materials and Methods: A total of 72 titanium implant abutments were divided into six groups (n = 12 each) based on the selected surface treatment: (1) untreated; (2) sandblasted; (3) hydrogen peroxide–etched; (4) atmospheric plasma; (5) chemical mechanical polishing; and (6) titanium dioxide nanocoating. After the surface treatments, scanning electron microscopy analyses and roughness measurements of the abutment surfaces were performed. Then, 72 metal copings were fabricated and cemented onto the abutments with dual-curing resin cement. After the thermocycling process, crown retention was measured by using a universal testing machine. The experimental results were statistically evaluated with one-way analysis of variance, Tukey honest significant difference, and Tamhane T2 tests. Results: The highest surface roughness values were obtained in the sandblasted group (1.44 um), which also showed in the highest retention values (828.5 N), followed by the hydrogen peroxide etching group (490.7 N), the atmospheric plasma group (466.5 N), the chemical mechanical polishing group (410.8 N), and the control group (382.6 N). Conclusion: Sandblasting, hydrogen peroxide, etching, and atmospheric plasma treatments significantly increased crown retention, and all alternative treatments, with the exception of TiO2 nanocoating, worked better than the control samples.
DOI	10.11607/ijp.6602
Cilt	36

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Effect of different surface treatments on retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns

Yazar Ozyetim, E. B., Özdemir, Zeynep, Başım, Gül Bahar, Bayraktar, G.

Basım Tarihi 2023

Basım Yeri - Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 0893-2174

Kayıt Numarası 23117063-374a-4c33-ba84-0e41529866fe

Lokasyon Mechanical Engineering

Tarih 2023

Örnek Metin To evaluate the effect of different treatments applied to titanium implant abutment surfaces on the retention of implant-supported crowns retained using resin cement. Materials and Methods: A total of 72 titanium implant abutments were divided into six groups (n = 12 each) based on the selected surface treatment: (1) untreated; (2) sandblasted; (3) hydrogen peroxide–etched; (4) atmospheric plasma; (5) chemical mechanical polishing; and (6) titanium dioxide nanocoating. After the surface treatments, scanning electron microscopy analyses and roughness measurements of the abutment surfaces were performed. Then, 72 metal copings were fabricated and cemented onto the abutments with dual-curing resin cement. After the thermocycling process, crown retention was measured by using a universal testing machine. The experimental results were statistically evaluated with one-way analysis of variance, Tukey honest significant difference, and Tamhane T2 tests. Results: The highest surface roughness values were obtained in the sandblasted group (1.44 um), which also showed in the highest retention values (828.5 N), followed by the hydrogen peroxide etching group (490.7 N), the atmospheric plasma group (466.5 N), the chemical mechanical polishing group (410.8 N), and the control group (382.6 N). Conclusion: Sandblasting, hydrogen peroxide, etching, and atmospheric plasma treatments significantly increased crown retention, and all alternative treatments, with the exception of TiO2 nanocoating, worked better than the control samples.

DOI 10.11607/ijp.6602

Cilt 36