Legal pluralism and the Shari'a: a comparison of Greece and Turkey

Name: Legal pluralism and the Shari'a: a comparison of Greece and Turkey
Author: Turner, B. S., Arslan, Berna Zengin

İsim	Legal pluralism and the Shari'a: a comparison of Greece and Turkey
Yazar	Turner, B. S., Arslan, Berna Zengin
Basım Tarihi:	2014-08
Basım Yeri	- Wiley
Konu	Eugene Ehrlich, Greece, Legal centralism, Legal pluralism, Shari'a, Sovereignty, Turkey
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	1467-954X
Kayıt Numarası	3cdded88-2220-4ed3-b03b-b1a093379a6c
Lokasyon	Humanities and Social Sciences
Tarih	2014-08
Notlar	Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.
Örnek Metin	The creation of a national and unified legal system was an important aspect of the rise of the modern state and national citizenship. However, this interpretation of legal rationalization has been challenged by sociologists of law such as Eugene Ehrlich (1862–1922) who claimed that this juridical theory of state-centred law masked the presence of customary laws outside this formal system. In critical theories of the law, legal pluralism is proposed against the idea of legal sovereignty or legal centralism. In this article we explore the implications of the growth of the Shari'a as an example of legal pluralism. We take Turkey and Greece as two interesting but different examples of legal pluralism and consider the implications of these case studies for debates about liberalism, multiculturalism and citizenship in multi-faith societies.
DOI	10.1111/1467-954X.12117
Cilt	62

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Legal pluralism and the Shari'a: a comparison of Greece and Turkey

Yazar Turner, B. S., Arslan, Berna Zengin

Basım Tarihi 2014-08

Basım Yeri - Wiley

Konu Eugene Ehrlich, Greece, Legal centralism, Legal pluralism, Shari'a, Sovereignty, Turkey

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 1467-954X

Kayıt Numarası 3cdded88-2220-4ed3-b03b-b1a093379a6c

Lokasyon Humanities and Social Sciences

Tarih 2014-08

Notlar Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.

Örnek Metin The creation of a national and unified legal system was an important aspect of the rise of the modern state and national citizenship. However, this interpretation of legal rationalization has been challenged by sociologists of law such as Eugene Ehrlich (1862–1922) who claimed that this juridical theory of state-centred law masked the presence of customary laws outside this formal system. In critical theories of the law, legal pluralism is proposed against the idea of legal sovereignty or legal centralism. In this article we explore the implications of the growth of the Shari'a as an example of legal pluralism. We take Turkey and Greece as two interesting but different examples of legal pluralism and consider the implications of these case studies for debates about liberalism, multiculturalism and citizenship in multi-faith societies.

DOI 10.1111/1467-954X.12117

Cilt 62