University rankings on architecture and built environment: The case of Turkey

Name: University rankings on architecture and built environment: The case of Turkey
Author: Hacıhasanoğlu, Orhan

İsim	University rankings on architecture and built environment: The case of Turkey
Yazar	Hacıhasanoğlu, Orhan
Basım Tarihi:	2018-05
Basım Yeri	- İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
Konu	University, Ranking, Architecture, Built environment
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	2564-7474
Kayıt Numarası	a85aff5c-13a8-4fc4-9922-14795693cd95
Lokasyon	Architecture
Tarih	2018-05
Notlar	European Commission
Örnek Metin	Stakeholders of universities like students, faculty, administratives, prospective students and their parents; always looking at rankings of the universities to benchmark the different factors. Faculty, administrative staff and the existing students use rankings to search the quality and the status of the university and the programme, on the other hand prospective students and their parents trying to find out the best university and programme to suit their expects. This paper aim to explain the programme rankings in architecture and also architecture and built environment subjects in the case of Turkey. Istanbul Technical University and Middle East Technical University Architecture Programmes were in the first 100-150 ranks in QS Architecture and Built Environment ranking and also in the first 100 in URAP Architecture ranking in 2017 reports. The paper try to make comparision to the other architecture programmes with these two cases form Turkey on different parameters like age, academic reputation, research, number of students, country, city. The study also aims to consider a projection for the following years in Architecture programme rankings. The prospective schools of architecture which considered as new candidates for the following years also evaluated in this paper. The methodology of the paper is based on the bencharking by using different parameters. The main idea of the paper in conclusion show that these two cases from Turkey had a success story in architecture and built environment programme ranking in these two university ranking systems.
DOI	10.5505/itujfa.2018.62681
Cilt	15

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

University rankings on architecture and built environment: The case of Turkey

Yazar Hacıhasanoğlu, Orhan

Basım Tarihi 2018-05

Basım Yeri - İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

Konu University, Ranking, Architecture, Built environment

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 2564-7474

Kayıt Numarası a85aff5c-13a8-4fc4-9922-14795693cd95

Lokasyon Architecture

Tarih 2018-05

Notlar European Commission

Örnek Metin Stakeholders of universities like students, faculty, administratives, prospective students and their parents; always looking at rankings of the universities to benchmark the different factors. Faculty, administrative staff and the existing students use rankings to search the quality and the status of the university and the programme, on the other hand prospective students and their parents trying to find out the best university and programme to suit their expects. This paper aim to explain the programme rankings in architecture and also architecture and built environment subjects in the case of Turkey. Istanbul Technical University and Middle East Technical University Architecture Programmes were in the first 100-150 ranks in QS Architecture and Built Environment ranking and also in the first 100 in URAP Architecture ranking in 2017 reports. The paper try to make comparision to the other architecture programmes with these two cases form Turkey on different parameters like age, academic reputation, research, number of students, country, city. The study also aims to consider a projection for the following years in Architecture programme rankings. The prospective schools of architecture which considered as new candidates for the following years also evaluated in this paper. The methodology of the paper is based on the bencharking by using different parameters. The main idea of the paper in conclusion show that these two cases from Turkey had a success story in architecture and built environment programme ranking in these two university ranking systems.

DOI 10.5505/itujfa.2018.62681

Cilt 15