Exploring publicness as social practice: An analysis on social support within an emerging economy

Name: Exploring publicness as social practice: An analysis on social support within an emerging economy
Author: Bilbil, Ebru Tekin, Zihnioğlu, O., Fırtın, C. E., Bracci, E.

İsim	Exploring publicness as social practice: An analysis on social support within an emerging economy
Yazar	Bilbil, Ebru Tekin, Zihnioğlu, O., Fırtın, C. E., Bracci, E.
Basım Tarihi:	2023-12-23
Basım Yeri	- Wiley
Konu	Accountability, Contextual shifts, Publicness, Social field, Social support
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	0267-4424
Kayıt Numarası	de0c7a65-214c-46e9-b24c-c905c6d1b89e
Lokasyon	Hotel Management
Tarih	2023-12-23
Örnek Metin	By utilizing the concepts of field, habitus, and capital inherited from Bourdieu, this study explores publicness as a social practice. In doing this, the paper problematizes publicness concerning accountability and public value and empirically explores the organization of social support delivery in Istanbul. We posit our research question: In what manners does publicness open up a space for collaboration and convergence in relation to accountability? The data gathering and analysis follow a qualitative methodology. We found different forms of publicness under three different conditionalities: (1) publicness as political authority based on hierarchization and centralization; (2) publicness as competing positions produced by diverse actors and their diverse positions taken beyond hierarchical relations; (3) publicness as social inclusion and diversity that is all-embracing by employing more inclusive practices. Publicness relationally unfolds public value with and among formal rules, voluntary practices, and networks. By delving into constitutive elements of practice—symbolic capital and habitus—engaging in the field struggles of redefining and owning publicness, the paper goes beyond the conventional dichotomy of normative versus empirical conceptualizations of publicness and instead differentiates among distinct forms of publicness in different conditionalities and contributes to the literature by bridging publicness and accountability habitus.
DOI	10.1111/faam.12385

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Exploring publicness as social practice: An analysis on social support within an emerging economy

Yazar Bilbil, Ebru Tekin, Zihnioğlu, O., Fırtın, C. E., Bracci, E.

Basım Tarihi 2023-12-23

Basım Yeri - Wiley

Konu Accountability, Contextual shifts, Publicness, Social field, Social support

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 0267-4424

Kayıt Numarası de0c7a65-214c-46e9-b24c-c905c6d1b89e

Lokasyon Hotel Management

Tarih 2023-12-23

Örnek Metin By utilizing the concepts of field, habitus, and capital inherited from Bourdieu, this study explores publicness as a social practice. In doing this, the paper problematizes publicness concerning accountability and public value and empirically explores the organization of social support delivery in Istanbul. We posit our research question: In what manners does publicness open up a space for collaboration and convergence in relation to accountability? The data gathering and analysis follow a qualitative methodology. We found different forms of publicness under three different conditionalities: (1) publicness as political authority based on hierarchization and centralization; (2) publicness as competing positions produced by diverse actors and their diverse positions taken beyond hierarchical relations; (3) publicness as social inclusion and diversity that is all-embracing by employing more inclusive practices. Publicness relationally unfolds public value with and among formal rules, voluntary practices, and networks. By delving into constitutive elements of practice—symbolic capital and habitus—engaging in the field struggles of redefining and owning publicness, the paper goes beyond the conventional dichotomy of normative versus empirical conceptualizations of publicness and instead differentiates among distinct forms of publicness in different conditionalities and contributes to the literature by bridging publicness and accountability habitus.

DOI 10.1111/faam.12385