Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis

Name: Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author: Eylem, O., de Wit, L., van Straten, A., Steubl, L., Melissourgaki, Z., Danışman, Gözde Topgüloğlu, de Vries, R., Kerkhof, Ad J. F. M., Bhui, K., Cuijpers, P.

İsim	Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yazar	Eylem, O., de Wit, L., van Straten, A., Steubl, L., Melissourgaki, Z., Danışman, Gözde Topgüloğlu, de Vries, R., Kerkhof, Ad J. F. M., Bhui, K., Cuijpers, P.
Basım Tarihi:	2020-06-08
Basım Yeri	- Springer Nature
Konu	Stigma, Mental illness stigma, Common mental disorders, Racial minorities
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	1471-2458
Kayıt Numarası	55e2ccdd-ed82-4a56-89ac-9d59363e9cc5
Tarih	2020-06-08
Örnek Metin	Background: There is a strong stigma attached to mental disorders preventing those affected from getting psychological help. The consequences of stigma are worse for racial and/or ethnic minorities compared to racial and/or ethnic majorities since the former often experience other social adversities such as poverty and discrimination within policies and institutions. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the evidence on the impact of differences in mental illness stigma between racial minorities and majorities. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included cross-sectional studies comparing mental illness stigma between racial minorities and majorities. Systematic searches were conducted in the bibliographic databases of PubMed, PsycINFO and EMBASE until 20th December 2018. Outcomes were extracted from published reports, and meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses were conducted in CMA software. Results: After screening 2787 abstracts, 29 studies with 193,418 participants (N = 35,836 in racial minorities) were eligible for analyses. Racial minorities showed more stigma than racial majorities (g = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12 similar to 0.27) for common mental disorders. Sensitivity analyses showed robustness of these results. Multivariate meta-regression analyses pointed to the possible moderating role of the number of studies with high risk of bias on the effect size. Racial minorities have more stigma for common mental disorders when compared with majorities. Limitations included moderate to high risk of bias, high heterogeneity, few studies in most comparisons, and the use of non-standardized outcome measures. Conclusions: Mental illness stigma is higher among ethnic minorities than majorities. An important clinical implication of these findings would be to tailor anti-stigma strategies related with mental illnesses according to specific racial and/or ethnic backgrounds with the intention to improve mental health outreach.
DOI	10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3
Cilt	20

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yazar Eylem, O., de Wit, L., van Straten, A., Steubl, L., Melissourgaki, Z., Danışman, Gözde Topgüloğlu, de Vries, R., Kerkhof, Ad J. F. M., Bhui, K., Cuijpers, P.

Basım Tarihi 2020-06-08

Basım Yeri - Springer Nature

Konu Stigma, Mental illness stigma, Common mental disorders, Racial minorities

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 1471-2458

Kayıt Numarası 55e2ccdd-ed82-4a56-89ac-9d59363e9cc5

Tarih 2020-06-08

Örnek Metin Background: There is a strong stigma attached to mental disorders preventing those affected from getting psychological help. The consequences of stigma are worse for racial and/or ethnic minorities compared to racial and/or ethnic majorities since the former often experience other social adversities such as poverty and discrimination within policies and institutions. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the evidence on the impact of differences in mental illness stigma between racial minorities and majorities. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included cross-sectional studies comparing mental illness stigma between racial minorities and majorities. Systematic searches were conducted in the bibliographic databases of PubMed, PsycINFO and EMBASE until 20th December 2018. Outcomes were extracted from published reports, and meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses were conducted in CMA software. Results: After screening 2787 abstracts, 29 studies with 193,418 participants (N = 35,836 in racial minorities) were eligible for analyses. Racial minorities showed more stigma than racial majorities (g = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12 similar to 0.27) for common mental disorders. Sensitivity analyses showed robustness of these results. Multivariate meta-regression analyses pointed to the possible moderating role of the number of studies with high risk of bias on the effect size. Racial minorities have more stigma for common mental disorders when compared with majorities. Limitations included moderate to high risk of bias, high heterogeneity, few studies in most comparisons, and the use of non-standardized outcome measures. Conclusions: Mental illness stigma is higher among ethnic minorities than majorities. An important clinical implication of these findings would be to tailor anti-stigma strategies related with mental illnesses according to specific racial and/or ethnic backgrounds with the intention to improve mental health outreach.

DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3

Cilt 20