Turkey's position on IDP properties: lessons (not) learned

Name: Turkey's position on IDP properties: lessons (not) learned
Author: Sert, Deniz Şenol

İsim	Turkey's position on IDP properties: lessons (not) learned
Yazar	Sert, Deniz Şenol
Basım Tarihi:	2017-10
Basım Yeri	- Wiley
Konu	Transitional justice, Return
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	0020-7985
Kayıt Numarası	b41d7ac3-5709-4159-a98c-384c9234b291
Lokasyon	International Relations
Tarih	2017-10
Notlar	Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.
Örnek Metin	Three issues: security, economics and justice, are the keys to comprehending the essence of problems of property and IDP return in conflict settings. The case of Turkey presents an interesting framework for analysing issues related to IDP property, both in the context of the Kurdish issue in the Southeast of the country, and in Cyprus. Comparing the position of Turkey in these two settings, the article argues that, while it utilizes domestic mechanisms to avoid international pressures very well, especially by exhausting the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights to reinforce legitimacy of its policies, Turkey's position on the return of and/or compensation for IDP properties lacks transparency, disregarding principles of justice without respect for human rights.
DOI	10.1111/imig.12290
Cilt	55

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Turkey's position on IDP properties: lessons (not) learned

Yazar Sert, Deniz Şenol

Basım Tarihi 2017-10

Basım Yeri - Wiley

Konu Transitional justice, Return

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 0020-7985

Kayıt Numarası b41d7ac3-5709-4159-a98c-384c9234b291

Lokasyon International Relations

Tarih 2017-10

Notlar Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.

Örnek Metin Three issues: security, economics and justice, are the keys to comprehending the essence of problems of property and IDP return in conflict settings. The case of Turkey presents an interesting framework for analysing issues related to IDP property, both in the context of the Kurdish issue in the Southeast of the country, and in Cyprus. Comparing the position of Turkey in these two settings, the article argues that, while it utilizes domestic mechanisms to avoid international pressures very well, especially by exhausting the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights to reinforce legitimacy of its policies, Turkey's position on the return of and/or compensation for IDP properties lacks transparency, disregarding principles of justice without respect for human rights.

DOI 10.1111/imig.12290

Cilt 55