Getting into top-ranked management journals from business schools at the periphery: The role of doctoral education and co-authorship

Name: Getting into top-ranked management journals from business schools at the periphery: The role of doctoral education and co-authorship
Author: Altunsu, B., Duygulu, O., Usdiken, Behlul

İsim	Getting into top-ranked management journals from business schools at the periphery: The role of doctoral education and co-authorship
Yazar	Altunsu, B., Duygulu, O., Usdiken, Behlul
Basım Tarihi:	2025-04
Basım Yeri	- Sage
Konu	Quantitative research, Qualitative research, Decontextualization, Contextualization, Centre-periphery model, Academic management journals
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	1350-5076
Kayıt Numarası	507ebce5-f299-49e9-bbd6-194c568486e1
Lokasyon	Business Administration
Tarih	2025-04
Örnek Metin	Drawing upon recent extensions of the centre-periphery model, we examine research and publications by academics at the periphery within the present environment of increasing institutional pressures to publish internationally. Reviewing the emergence and the historical development of management as a discipline, we describe the fragmentation in approaches to research that has arisen in this field among countries that are typically considered as the 'centre' of worldwide scholarship. We propose and empirically demonstrate that the differentiation within the 'centre' becomes largely mirrored at the periphery with respect to attention to societal contexts, research methodology and publishing. Our companion argument that doctoral education in and/or co-authorship ties to various parts of the 'centre', or a lack thereof, serve as the main vehicles in generating heterogeneity and some degree of agency at the periphery receives strong support. We also find that when ties to the 'centre' are absent contributions from the periphery remain limited. In addition, we show that tendencies towards decontextualized research, quantitative methodologies and publishing in US-based journals have become stronger over time. The article concludes with a discussion of the theoretical contributions, main findings and the implications of our study for the possible futures of research at the periphery.
DOI	10.1177/13505076231223115
Cilt	56

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Getting into top-ranked management journals from business schools at the periphery: The role of doctoral education and co-authorship

Yazar Altunsu, B., Duygulu, O., Usdiken, Behlul

Basım Tarihi 2025-04

Basım Yeri - Sage

Konu Quantitative research, Qualitative research, Decontextualization, Contextualization, Centre-periphery model, Academic management journals

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 1350-5076

Kayıt Numarası 507ebce5-f299-49e9-bbd6-194c568486e1

Lokasyon Business Administration

Tarih 2025-04

Örnek Metin Drawing upon recent extensions of the centre-periphery model, we examine research and publications by academics at the periphery within the present environment of increasing institutional pressures to publish internationally. Reviewing the emergence and the historical development of management as a discipline, we describe the fragmentation in approaches to research that has arisen in this field among countries that are typically considered as the 'centre' of worldwide scholarship. We propose and empirically demonstrate that the differentiation within the 'centre' becomes largely mirrored at the periphery with respect to attention to societal contexts, research methodology and publishing. Our companion argument that doctoral education in and/or co-authorship ties to various parts of the 'centre', or a lack thereof, serve as the main vehicles in generating heterogeneity and some degree of agency at the periphery receives strong support. We also find that when ties to the 'centre' are absent contributions from the periphery remain limited. In addition, we show that tendencies towards decontextualized research, quantitative methodologies and publishing in US-based journals have become stronger over time. The article concludes with a discussion of the theoretical contributions, main findings and the implications of our study for the possible futures of research at the periphery.

DOI 10.1177/13505076231223115

Cilt 56