Critical review of the parameters affecting the effectiveness of moisture absorption treatments used for natural composites

Name: Critical review of the parameters affecting the effectiveness of moisture absorption treatments used for natural composites
Author: Al-Maharma, Ahmad Yousef Mohammad, Al-Huniti, N.

İsim	Critical review of the parameters affecting the effectiveness of moisture absorption treatments used for natural composites
Yazar	Al-Maharma, Ahmad Yousef Mohammad, Al-Huniti, N.
Basım Tarihi:	2019
Basım Yeri	- MDPI AG,
Konu	Diffusivity, Hydrophilicity, Hydrophobicity, Interfacial adhesion, Moisture treatments
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	2504-477X
Kayıt Numarası	70dd0441-2ea2-4f72-8550-307cf8c7c37d
Tarih	2019
Örnek Metin	Natural composites can be fabricated through reinforcing either synthetic or bio-based polymers with hydrophilic natural fibers. Ultimate moisture absorption resistance at the fiber–matrix interface can be achieved when hydrophilic natural fibers are used to reinforce biopolymers due to the high degree of compatibility between them. However, the cost of biopolymers is several times higher than that of their synthetic counterparts, which hinders their dissemination in various industries. In order to produce economically feasible natural composites, synthetic resins are frequently reinforced with hydrophilic fibers, which increases the incompatibility issues such as the creation of voids and delamination at fiber–matrix interfaces. Therefore, applying chemical and/or physical treatments to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks is of primary importance. However, it is demonstrated through this review study that these treatments do not guarantee a sufficient improvement of the moisture absorption properties of natural composites, and the moisture treatments should be applied under the consideration of the following parameters: (i) type of hosting matrix; (ii) type of natural fiber; (iii) loading of natural fiber; (iv) the hybridization of natural fibers with mineral/synthetic counterparts; (v) implantation of nanofillers. Complete discussion about each of these parameters is developed through this study.
DOI	10.3390/jcs3010027
Cilt	3

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Critical review of the parameters affecting the effectiveness of moisture absorption treatments used for natural composites

Yazar Al-Maharma, Ahmad Yousef Mohammad, Al-Huniti, N.

Basım Tarihi 2019

Basım Yeri - MDPI AG,

Konu Diffusivity, Hydrophilicity, Hydrophobicity, Interfacial adhesion, Moisture treatments

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 2504-477X

Kayıt Numarası 70dd0441-2ea2-4f72-8550-307cf8c7c37d

Tarih 2019

Örnek Metin Natural composites can be fabricated through reinforcing either synthetic or bio-based polymers with hydrophilic natural fibers. Ultimate moisture absorption resistance at the fiber–matrix interface can be achieved when hydrophilic natural fibers are used to reinforce biopolymers due to the high degree of compatibility between them. However, the cost of biopolymers is several times higher than that of their synthetic counterparts, which hinders their dissemination in various industries. In order to produce economically feasible natural composites, synthetic resins are frequently reinforced with hydrophilic fibers, which increases the incompatibility issues such as the creation of voids and delamination at fiber–matrix interfaces. Therefore, applying chemical and/or physical treatments to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks is of primary importance. However, it is demonstrated through this review study that these treatments do not guarantee a sufficient improvement of the moisture absorption properties of natural composites, and the moisture treatments should be applied under the consideration of the following parameters: (i) type of hosting matrix; (ii) type of natural fiber; (iii) loading of natural fiber; (iv) the hybridization of natural fibers with mineral/synthetic counterparts; (v) implantation of nanofillers. Complete discussion about each of these parameters is developed through this study.

DOI 10.3390/jcs3010027

Cilt 3