Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality

Name: Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality
Author: Ymamgulyyeva, A., Kafesçioğlu, Nilüfer, Harma, M.

İsim	Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality
Yazar	Ymamgulyyeva, A., Kafesçioğlu, Nilüfer, Harma, M.
Basım Tarihi:	2023-04
Basım Yeri	- Wiley
Konu	Dyadic analysis, Marital quality, Relationship power, Sexism, Social dominance orientation
Tür	Süreli Yayın
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	0197-6664
Kayıt Numarası	6656ff1b-3415-4bc5-a721-d8a2015e2f6a
Lokasyon	Psychology
Tarih	2023-04
Örnek Metin	Objective: This study aimed to investigate the actor–partner effects of attitudes toward group-based inequality as measured by social dominance orientation (SDO) and marital quality, and the indirect actor–partner effects of SDO on marital quality via ambivalent sexism and partners' perceptions of their own relationship power toward their partner. Background: Previous research suggests that certain social attitudes play a role in relationship processes. However, it is unclear whether broader views on social inequality could have an effect on partners' marital quality. Method: Ninety heterosexual married couples in Turkey (N = 180) responded via an online survey on SDO, marital quality, relationship power, and ambivalent sexism. Actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) and actor–partner interdependence model of mediation (APIMeM) were conducted to examine the direct and indirect actor–partner effects. Results: For indirect effects, men's SDO was negatively associated with their marital quality through their relationship power and hostile sexism. No significant indirect effects were found for women. However, women's relationship power was positively and their benevolent sexism was negatively associated with their own and their partners' marital quality. Conclusion: Our findings help develop a more comprehensive understanding of how the political, social, and personal aspects of our lives are connected with one another. Implications: Our study points to the importance of exploring the topic of men's and women's views toward social inequality and its effects on their close relationships in clinical practice and relational education.
DOI	10.1111/fare.12881

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality

Yazar Ymamgulyyeva, A., Kafesçioğlu, Nilüfer, Harma, M.

Basım Tarihi 2023-04

Basım Yeri - Wiley

Konu Dyadic analysis, Marital quality, Relationship power, Sexism, Social dominance orientation

Tür Süreli Yayın

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 0197-6664

Kayıt Numarası 6656ff1b-3415-4bc5-a721-d8a2015e2f6a

Lokasyon Psychology

Tarih 2023-04

Örnek Metin Objective: This study aimed to investigate the actor–partner effects of attitudes toward group-based inequality as measured by social dominance orientation (SDO) and marital quality, and the indirect actor–partner effects of SDO on marital quality via ambivalent sexism and partners' perceptions of their own relationship power toward their partner. Background: Previous research suggests that certain social attitudes play a role in relationship processes. However, it is unclear whether broader views on social inequality could have an effect on partners' marital quality. Method: Ninety heterosexual married couples in Turkey (N = 180) responded via an online survey on SDO, marital quality, relationship power, and ambivalent sexism. Actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) and actor–partner interdependence model of mediation (APIMeM) were conducted to examine the direct and indirect actor–partner effects. Results: For indirect effects, men's SDO was negatively associated with their marital quality through their relationship power and hostile sexism. No significant indirect effects were found for women. However, women's relationship power was positively and their benevolent sexism was negatively associated with their own and their partners' marital quality. Conclusion: Our findings help develop a more comprehensive understanding of how the political, social, and personal aspects of our lives are connected with one another. Implications: Our study points to the importance of exploring the topic of men's and women's views toward social inequality and its effects on their close relationships in clinical practice and relational education.

DOI 10.1111/fare.12881